HOME FORUM RULES CONTACT
     
   
   

Go Back   CLASS RACER FORUM > Class Racer Forums > Stock and Super Stock
Register Photo Gallery FAQ Community Calendar

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-04-2011, 11:22 AM   #1
Alan Roehrich
Veteran Member
 
Alan Roehrich's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Murfreesboro TN
Posts: 5,118
Likes: 1,573
Liked 1,836 Times in 417 Posts
Default Re: What would S, S/S be without teardowns at Nats?

Wade, I've had more than one well respected tech guy tell me they found at least 3 times as many illegal cars in the bottom half of the field as they have in the top half.

What Stock and Super Stock would be without random tear downs is an easy question. They would be a joke, a hollow shell of their former selves. Worse off by far than they already are.

Car counts are down because of the economy and the way NHRA treats the racers. We're about to pay $4 a gallon for diesel, the cost to go to the Gators, if we go, will be $1K in diesel alone. They jacked our entry fee, and our insurance charge, again, fees are up for the 3rd year in a row. They added a $250 fine for any leakage on the track. The contingency payout has shrunk. The regular purse payout has not gone up in so long no one can remember the last date, but I'm thinking a decade. We're the first cars cut from the run sheet due to ANY problems, weather, oil downs, etc, we get shorted a pass. They'll send us into eliminations with ONE PASS, on a green track, that may or may not even hook. We have to get there 1-2 days before the event, or park 90 miles from nowhere, probably in a bad pit space where the truck, trailer, or car, or all three, might sink or flood if it rains. And if the race runs over, we're the ones who lose an extra day of work because we get held over until Monday.

If they need to cheat to run 3 tenths under the index, they need to consider another hobby.

Tear downs are the least of anyone's worries. And if they are worried about being legal, they need to tear down anyway.

The last thing we need to do is further reduce and dilute the performance part of the performance based classes. Too much of that has already been done.
__________________
Alan Roehrich
212A G/S
Alan Roehrich is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-2011, 11:50 AM   #2
GUMP
VIP Member
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Shelby, NC
Posts: 1,823
Likes: 2,168
Liked 2,354 Times in 554 Posts
Default Re: What would S, S/S be without teardowns at Nats?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Alan Roehrich View Post
If they need to cheat to run 3 tenths under the index, they need to consider another hobby.

Tear downs are the least of anyone's worries. And if they are worried about being legal, they need to tear down anyway.

The last thing we need to do is further reduce and dilute the performance part of the performance based classes. Too much of that has already been done.
Well said!
GUMP is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-2011, 12:12 PM   #3
Shawn Blair
Member
 
Shawn Blair's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Everson, WA.
Posts: 122
Likes: 1
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Wink Re: What would S, S/S be without teardowns at Nats?

Quote:
Originally Posted by GUMP View Post
Well said!
I agree!!!
__________________
Shawn Blair 6383 SS 634 STK
Shawn Blair is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-2011, 02:26 PM   #4
Wade Mahaffey
Senior Member
 
Wade Mahaffey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 581
Likes: 0
Liked 17 Times in 7 Posts
Default Re: What would S, S/S be without teardowns at Nats?

Alan and Billy, I understand your passion and it's a beautifull thing. I don't know either of you personally, but respect your seniority in the sport. I look at it like this: compromise during tough times to keep it alive. I would give a little, to keep from losing the whole thing. Then ride the rough time while looking for ways to improve. Isn't that what the Stock, Super/Stock combo races are about. There is no teardown at those events, It's no heads-up and a dial-in. Now the car counts are becoming about the same, but the swing is toward the combos. There must be something folks like about it, maybe it's just aggravation mitigation! LOL

Wade Mahaffey
Wade Mahaffey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-2011, 02:58 PM   #5
Ed Fernandez
Veteran Member
 
Ed Fernandez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: NOO JOISEY nexta NOO YAWK
Posts: 5,879
Likes: 38
Liked 100 Times in 45 Posts
Default Re: What would S, S/S be without teardowns at Nats?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wade Mahaffey View Post
Alan and Billy, I understand your passion and it's a beautifull thing. I don't know either of you personally, but respect your seniority in the sport. I look at it like this: compromise during tough times to keep it alive. I would give a little, to keep from losing the whole thing. Then ride the rough time while looking for ways to improve. Isn't that what the Stock, Super/Stock combo races are about. There is no teardown at those events, It's no heads-up and a dial-in. Now the car counts are becoming about the same, but the swing is toward the combos. There must be something folks like about it, maybe it's just aggravation mitigation! LOL

Wade Mahaffey
I look at it like this: compromise during tough times to keep it alive. I would give a little, to keep from losing the whole thing. Then ride the rough time while looking for ways to improve. Isn't that what the Stock, Super/Stock combo races are about. There is no tear down at those events, It's no heads-up and a dial-in.

If you want to do this go to your local track every weekend.It's called bracket racing.Been around a long time.

Ben Franklin's quote,actually about liberty,comes close to compromising on S/SS rules
is right on the mark
Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.
__________________
Former NHRA #1945
Former IHRA #1945
T/SA
Ed Fernandez is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-2011, 03:02 PM   #6
CycloneFE
Senior Member
 
CycloneFE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Decatur Illinois
Posts: 634
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Default Re: What would S, S/S be without teardowns at Nats?

It sounds like to me that the combo's cost less to enter and pay almost what the sanctioned race does with less BS and "enhancements". If the NHRA does not wake up they will have lost their cash cow.

As these guys have said before, it may not be fixable.
__________________
Steve Jackson
CycloneFE is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-2011, 03:02 PM   #7
Mark Yacavone
Veteran Member
 
Mark Yacavone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Miles From Nowhere
Posts: 7,818
Likes: 2,909
Liked 5,126 Times in 1,954 Posts
Default Re: What would S, S/S be without teardowns at Nats?

Wade, there are no teardowns at Divisionals except for Nat'l records and now there's a cap on them,for the most part.
Those entries are way down too.
I can't see where no teardowns at Nat'l would do anything except bring us even closer to Bracket II
__________________
"We are lucky we don't get as much Government as we pay for." Will Rogers
Mark Yacavone is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-2011, 03:04 PM   #8
Alan Roehrich
Veteran Member
 
Alan Roehrich's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Murfreesboro TN
Posts: 5,118
Likes: 1,573
Liked 1,836 Times in 417 Posts
Default Re: What would S, S/S be without teardowns at Nats?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wade Mahaffey View Post
Alan and Billy, I understand your passion and it's a beautifull thing. I don't know either of you personally, but respect your seniority in the sport. I look at it like this: compromise during tough times to keep it alive. I would give a little, to keep from losing the whole thing. Then ride the rough time while looking for ways to improve. Isn't that what the Stock, Super/Stock combo races are about. There is no teardown at those events, It's no heads-up and a dial-in. Now the car counts are becoming about the same, but the swing is toward the combos. There must be something folks like about it, maybe it's just aggravation mitigation! LOL

Wade Mahaffey
Wade, our combo races are NOT "no heads up" races. We do have scales and heads up races. If we took the heads up races out we'd lose a lot of our car count. No, we don't have tear downs. But I don't think anyone would be happy about what would likely happen if they showed up at our races and tried to get away with cheating. because the racers would know.

It is not the lack of heads up races and the lack of tear down that make the combo races popular. It's the way the racers are treated.
__________________
Alan Roehrich
212A G/S
Alan Roehrich is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-2011, 03:20 PM   #9
Dennis P Chapman
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Toms River NJ
Posts: 1,594
Likes: 418
Liked 53 Times in 25 Posts
Default Re: What would S, S/S be without teardowns at Nats?

Tear downs are no fun at all plain and simple. If your setting a record that is your chose.
__________________
Dennis P Chapman 1904 STK
NHRA National Record Holder Car Owner.
Dennis P Chapman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-2011, 03:27 PM   #10
Nitro Joe Jackson
VIP Member
 
Nitro Joe Jackson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Loudonville, Ohio or where ever the Nitro Lounge is parked
Posts: 2,293
Likes: 58
Liked 67 Times in 19 Posts
Default Re: What would S, S/S be without teardowns at Nats?

Back in the day.............When my father won a national event at a AHRA or IHRA national event Vance Brady of AHRA would walk over and congratulate you and then tell you before we do winner circle pictures, we need a head off and then you can party as the winner.
But that was back in the day.
__________________
Nitro Joe Jackson STK 3431
nitrojoe@neo.rr.com
Nitro Joe Jackson is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:51 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.