|
11-11-2010, 05:23 PM | #41 |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 119
Likes: 8
Liked 6 Times in 6 Posts
|
Re: Red light debate update.
no thank you.....i understand your problem with the rule because you run a car that is affected by the first red light rule most, if not all the time.....but you get the clean tree and im guessing you have not spun in the last twenty or so years....there are always two sides and you can never make everyone happy...i wouldnt have a problem not displaying the red light on your side until the second car has left....this way the faster car wouldn't be able to see what the slower car did as far as red or green...what about that?
|
11-11-2010, 06:16 PM | #42 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: NOO JOISEY nexta NOO YAWK
Posts: 5,879
Likes: 38
Liked 100 Times in 45 Posts
|
Re: Red light debate update.
Quote:
Here's one for you.I hate when they spray the track and I'm the next pair down.I slow down a bit in the glue:>)Funny but true.I usually 60' about 1.76 and very rarely spin.But that's because I really pay attention to the condition of the starting line and also my 98" wheelbase usually puts me ahead of the bad spots.So it's pretty much even slow and fast. I appreciate someone of your talent and success posting here,as a lot of the complainers here don't even race in S/SS or if they do couldn't compensate for a situation that they neither can handle or understand. Come on Mike,jump in for one race.But you have to dial the car yourself.:>):>):>)
__________________
Former NHRA #1945 Former IHRA #1945 T/SA |
|
11-11-2010, 06:41 PM | #43 |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 119
Likes: 8
Liked 6 Times in 6 Posts
|
Re: Red light debate update.
i also hate when they spray in front me....cant remember having a problem but it scares me to death having to stage on what seems like wet surface....
as far as the gremlin goes....i cant do 6 cylinders...but if you had a 304 with a 3 speed i would be there in a minute |
11-12-2010, 12:06 AM | #44 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: NOO JOISEY nexta NOO YAWK
Posts: 5,879
Likes: 38
Liked 100 Times in 45 Posts
|
Re: Red light debate update.
Quote:
__________________
Former NHRA #1945 Former IHRA #1945 T/SA |
|
11-12-2010, 05:57 PM | #45 | |
VIP Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Egg Harbor Township, NJ
Posts: 1,386
Likes: 1,186
Liked 3,581 Times in 434 Posts
|
Re: Red light debate update.
Quote:
As far as the red light rule, here is my suggestion (just a suggestion people). How about extending the tree blocker all the way down to cover the red-light bulb and then the worst red-light loses? I believe the red bulb does cause a distraction to the faster car, especially in a 1-3 bulb handicapped race. The scoreboard would not light up until the second car leaves and the computer determines which light is "worse red" so that wouldn't be a distraction either. The code for that loop would be simple to write, we were taught how to write a similar program during my freshman year at college. Rules would stay as they currently are on a bye run, automatic win, no red light or break out in a bye run. Secondly, just from being the chaser in bracket racing to getting chased like a gang member in Super stock.. anyone who is even attempting to say that slower cars have an advantage in a drag race should really think through their hypothesis again (or must really have eyes in the back of their Simpsons). The whole race is in front of you, and currently you have the red light advantage working in your favor. Now I can't defend the slower car who never references his/her opponent and breaks out while said opponent is parked at midtrack but I am 99% sure a faster car has never gotten around a broken car at half-track and neglected to lift. "Build a faster car" is not the answer people want to hear, especially people who care about preserving great classes that go beyond SS/AM or AA/SA. If that's the case, build a slow car so you can see a clean tree. Not seeing a "clean tree" in my opinion, is only a small (and easily corrected) sacrifice for the advantages that lie ahead for the next 1320 feet. Don't forget being the faster car, my friends, is the reason we have that idiotic tool known as a throttle stop in all the super index classes. People wanna chase. |
|
11-12-2010, 07:32 PM | #46 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: NOO JOISEY nexta NOO YAWK
Posts: 5,879
Likes: 38
Liked 100 Times in 45 Posts
|
Re: Red light debate update.
Blinding the whole tree and going to a worse foul scenario sounds like a good compromise UNTIL the fast guys will bring up the "I'm distracted by seeing the slower car in my field of vision" song.I guess the solution would be a wall 6' high seperating the lanes out far enough to shield the turtle cars to a point where they would not be visible.
__________________
Former NHRA #1945 Former IHRA #1945 T/SA |
11-12-2010, 07:45 PM | #47 | |
VIP Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Richmond Hill, Georgia
Posts: 2,003
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
Re: Red light debate update.
Quote:
__________________
Art Leong 2095 SS |
|
11-12-2010, 07:47 PM | #48 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Richmond Hill, Georgia
Posts: 2,003
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
Re: Red light debate update.
One reason I could see NHRA not going for it is breakage.
If I red light a lot of guys can come off the converter, and take it easy.
__________________
Art Leong 2095 SS |
11-12-2010, 07:52 PM | #49 |
VIP Member
|
Re: Red light debate update.
I don't know about that Michael, because two months ago I had the pleasure of doing something in a drag race that I don't get to do often....leave last (by nearly a full second). Needless to say I carded a .005rt., and my opponent was (.100 +) sleepy (perhaps to be clean and green?), thus allowing me to reel him in by the 1000ft mark, on my way to one of my easiest rnd wins since the last import car I raced!!! I wasn't pressured, but it was different....fun but different!
__________________
Gary Hampton '86 Z24,173 V6 CF/S #5824 (#78 in 2021) |
11-12-2010, 07:59 PM | #50 |
VIP Member
|
Re: Red light debate update.
I like that idea Mike, because that would (in fact) put the same pressure on the faster car as it does on the slower one...I'm glad that someone with your success in our sport offered it too!
__________________
Gary Hampton '86 Z24,173 V6 CF/S #5824 (#78 in 2021) |
|
|