|
|
![]() |
#1 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 1,660
Likes: 8
Liked 44 Times in 27 Posts
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 644
Likes: 131
Liked 140 Times in 51 Posts
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Gilbert, AZ
Posts: 36
Likes: 7
Liked 7 Times in 4 Posts
|
![]()
I cant stand it anymore
The simple solution is to implement the valve spring rule-period! Stock spring pressure. There would be no 9800 rpm hemis or 9800 rpm anything else. IMO this was the downfall of stock. Lower rpm no acid heads or manifolds needed. No $1000 lifters no $7500 heads. Wouldnt matter cause they cant flow at lower rpm. Just my 2 cents
__________________
Jess Suter 7305 Stock/SS Duster "life is not a rehearsal" |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 494
Likes: 6
Liked 25 Times in 16 Posts
|
![]()
I thought the allowance of going to Honda/IRL rod journals in SS was stupid. This sounds like the rich racers putting the class out of reach for most people. NHRA must want to get the SS fields down to a pair of megabuck cars. Why bother to tech them at all? Just P&G one cylinder and wave it through. I would like to see fiberglass replacements for the aluminum front end cars as a cost savings. Cost saving measures would be nice rather than cost escalation.
__________________
Mopar 2 Ya! |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
Member
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 102
Likes: 6
Liked 88 Times in 28 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Black Creek, BC Canada
Posts: 331
Likes: 79
Liked 172 Times in 81 Posts
|
![]()
We are all entitled to our opinions but in my opinion, all materials should be as per OEM in both stock and SS. That should include cylinder heads and any other items affecting performance. The only exceptions I would consider would be rods and cranks, replacing iron items with steel (of equal weight) does help reduce oil downs.
Jim Mantle V/SA 6632 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: usa
Posts: 256
Likes: 1
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
![]()
Brought to you by the same "group" that got worked over combustion chambers thru tech and then got them made "legal". Apparantly can't run legally with the fast stuff. By the way, this won't be the first time a engine has passed tech with titanium valves which were switched right in front of techs eyes. To prevent it, just check the guy with the shop towel wiping down the valves.
Oh, and for the record I am against allowing titanium. They are light, they are tough, but they are unforgiving as Jeff said. Also need replacement frequently if they are the high dollar ones. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Sand Springs, OK
Posts: 8,132
Likes: 896
Liked 390 Times in 170 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
__________________
Ed Wright 4156 SS/JA |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Sponsor
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Reading, PA
Posts: 199
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]()
People, please write NHRA more letters so they don't continue to ruin the little bit of Super Stock that is left. Its not about how much it cost, its about the sport, the challenge, the strict rules. Once you take that away what's left?
If they allow this they should just jump right into eliminating cylinder head volumes too. Tunnel rams, inline carburetor placement, smaller rod journals, clutchless transmissions, all completely uncalled for changes that were made. What was wrong with the previous rules? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 | |
VIP Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Anthem, Arizona
Posts: 2,766
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
I recently held a 427 / 425 HP Ford intake valve from an old Hollman-Moody engine built in 1967 or so (the fishing boat engine I brought up on this forum). When disassembling the heads the head on an intake vale broke off. The dang thing was rifle drilled in the stem! Couldn't believe how light it was and it was a pretty large diameter valve. Now I know the exhaust are sodium filled on this engine but I didn't know they were doing this to intake valves back in the '60's. I'd have to say I'm with SS Engine guy and others on this. Based on my limited experience, I can't see the need. Sure it may be faster but I see no other benefit. Cost goes up, maintenance and replacement goes up and engine damage can be a real issue if one breaks. I lost two Stocker engines thanks to Mr. Schubeck, don't think I would want to go down this road.
__________________
Jeff Lee 7494 D/S '70 AMX |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|