|
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Raleigh, N.C
Posts: 212
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]()
Where can these be found ????
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 2,546
Likes: 0
Liked 10 Times in 10 Posts
|
![]()
HemiParts
I think there to be printed in one of the fall 'Musclecar' magazines. First one I read, was the 1969 440 Cuda M-Code (automatic only) Came through, as you know with a somewhat restrictive exhaust and E-70 x 14" tires. Standard gears 3.55,,Options 3.91 or 4.10 With 3.55 Gears; 13.92 @ 103 With 3.91 Gears; 13.70 @ 105 With 4.10 Gears; 13.55 @ 106 Note; With E-60 x 14" GoodYear tires on the 4.10 gear car. It ran a13.35 @ 108, with adjusted tire pressure. Note: A proto-type M-Code 440 4-speed car was produced in the Cuda. With 3.91 gears (only one tested). Ran 13.56 @ 107 PC |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Weeki Wachee, Florida
Posts: 348
Likes: 416
Liked 18 Times in 12 Posts
|
![]()
With E-60 x 14" GoodYear tires on the 4.10 gear car.
It ran a13.35 @ 108, with adjusted tire pressure. I wonder what it could have run with a pair of current 26x9" Slicks.....
__________________
"Real Race Cars Have Tailgates" |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 2,546
Likes: 0
Liked 10 Times in 10 Posts
|
![]()
Yes,
A fastback with 4.10 gears, and GoodYear E-60 x 14's. I would imagine adjusted tire pressure, meant 20 lbs. or so. General Info; Tread width of E60 x 14 = 7.50" (26.10" tall) General Info; Tread width of E70 x 14 = 6.25" (25.92" tall) Imagine the possibility, of that 440 with Super/Stock rear springs, and an adjustable pinion snubber, and 50/50 rear shocks. A 'Drag Traction Package' with the E-60 x 14's. Maybe low 13,00's X-Tech, I can think of many possibilities with that car. But your right on, with the 440 6-barrel and fiberglass lift-off hood with a cold air package Other smart things would have been, a trunk-mounted battery, aluminum intake manifold and aluminum water -pump housing. With the battery, you move 30 lbs. of weight off the nose, and put it over the right rear tire. An aluminum intake good for another 25 lbs or so, and the water pump-housing another 15 lbs. Fiberglass hood, minus the hinge-hardware, probably 50 lbs. A cold-air package utilizing the small (back of hood positioned) faux-vent scoops. Whether the car had a Tri-carb 6-Pack package, or aluminum DP 4-barrel. it would be some monster. Only thing that needed tweaking, would have been the exhaust system. A 3-piece cast iron unit for the drivers side would have been a possibility. Last edited by Paul Ceasrine; 07-20-2010 at 09:18 AM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 2,546
Likes: 0
Liked 10 Times in 10 Posts
|
![]()
One more I found, on the 1969 cars
1969 Cuda Coupe, 4-speed w/E70 x 14's (Weight #3183 lbs.) 383/330HP engine (Standard stock engine w/440 camshaft, #906 cycinder heads and 625 AVS carb) Standard gears; 3.23,, Options; 3.55 or 3.91 (Note: 4.10 gears were not part of the standard option list on the Cuda 383) w/3.23 Gears; 14.67 @ 95 mph w/3.55 Gears; 14.44 @ 96 mph w/3.91 Gears; 14.19 @ 98 mph w/4.10 Gears; 13.99 @ 100 mph (Test car only, with G-70 x 14" GoodYear Polyglass GT tires, (6.90" width x 26.81" tall) A 69' Cuda Fastback with the 4-speed was also tested (Weight #3279 lbs.) w/3.55 Gears; 14.42 @ 97 mph Though the car was heavier (96 lbs. than the lighter Coupe), it was a shade quicker. All of the weight was over the back-end (heavy full glass panel) giving it better off-line traction. PC Last edited by Paul Ceasrine; 07-19-2010 at 03:14 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Anthem, Arizona
Posts: 2,766
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
|
![]()
If you look at your old "Direct Connection Bible", DC never gave any credibility to the B/RB engined A-bodies being competitive as they seemed convinced it was too nose heavy. DC went on to compare the 440/375 to the 428/335 which were classed equally as I recall. DC found the HP rating of the 440 4bbl unfavorable to be competitive against the CJ.
__________________
Jeff Lee 7494 D/S '70 AMX |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |
VIP Member
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,542
Likes: 34
Liked 138 Times in 51 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
Cool stuff. Direct Connecetion did do a lot of big block A-body testing. Didn't they have a list of cams and respective ET's in a 400 ci Dart Sport or Duster? Last edited by Myron Piatek; 07-19-2010 at 09:05 PM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Anthem, Arizona
Posts: 2,766
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
|
![]()
What was cool about DC was they gave you a shopping list of parts to have to make ET ranges. If you wanted a 13 to 14 second 340 Dart, use this stuff. If you wanted it to 12 to 13 seconds, use this. On down the line to 10 second range and quicker. I always found it worked. In fact, my experience was I would be on the fast side of the table so there was plenty of cushion. I still have that "bible" and would never part with it. A lot of racing and dreaming memories in that book!
They also gave great formulas to show what ET could be predicted from MPH. Man, did I use that a lot and it is where I learned a lot. Today I use a simple formula of 1320 / MPH. It always seems to PO some people but those that can accept it become better racers. At least as far as the car goes.
__________________
Jeff Lee 7494 D/S '70 AMX |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 528
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]()
There was tons of information exchanged between MOPAR cars and the Corporation in the early days. MOPAR published letters and books with all the information in them. When I started building our Duster, a couple of years ago, I found out about the books and newsletters. I got a hold of a copy of a book on just the suspension modifications. At the Drag Race Reunion in Henderson I was discussing the information in the book with a factory, MOPAR car builder and he told me that if a team car designed something that worked, meaning kept them in front of the other manufacturer's, then the Corporation would send out letters to all of the "team car" giving them all of the information necessary to build and set-up the parts. As he said the Corporation did not care which car was in the winners circle on Sunday as long as it was a MOPAR. They swapped and changes tons of pieces on those cars from week-end to week-end.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 2,546
Likes: 0
Liked 10 Times in 10 Posts
|
![]()
Don't know if any of you guys remember the Chrysler Performance
Blue & White book (really an encyclopedia with all the special part #'s and trick stuff). P-F Flyer. No, the 67' Cuda with the 383/280HP engine was only available with 3.23 Sure-Grip Posi. The front disc brakes were mandatory on that car with the 383. The 3.55 and 3.91 gears were not available on that car. But, a little trick. If you ordered the special 'Tow Package', you could get stiffer rear shocks (1 1/8" piston), and short-helper leaf spring, and 4.10 gears. Not sure if a heavier clutch disc was provided on the 4-speed, but Dino said the A-727 transmission came from the factory with a B & M valve body RV/Towing shift kit on that option. PC A-727 transmission came with a B & M valve-body shift kit |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|