Quote:
Originally Posted by ItsyBitsySpider
As for my 2 cent opinion, judging someone harshly because of a signature is pretty darn shallow.
|
Agreed. But when it follows a company that has a track record of shaky stuff, it just adds fuel. They had a bunch of suits recalled and found faulty a little more than a year ago. They didn't handle that well at all, with lots of confusion and noise for their customers. Now it turns out they're skimping making counterfeit products, thumbing their noses at the certifying authority. They didn't handle it well, or it wouldn't have gone this far with lawsuits and decertification. And when they come to a partial resolution, the person in charge of the company basically thumbs their nose again, making a joke of the resolution.
We're talking about safety products here, messing with people's lives. It is the LAST place people should be doing any of the above: making people question the product, skirting the certification process, and making light of the issue. I can't imagine spending a dime with them ever.