Drooze

[Chris "drooze" Wertman]

Originally Posted by boostedf22c

Your tuner should know better than to send a car down the track without knowing 100% sure that the datalogging system is working.

Wasnt their call, was a consensus and a bet on me and the old mans part.

We knew the issues, we knew the risks we knew the reward, we played our cards, we lost the hand not the game.

The old man has a quote he likes to use when he makes a bad bet, or just simply gets beat in a hand "Sometimes you just gotta pay the man"

Such is life.

Knowledge told is good if it comes from a trusted source, but it is still no replacement for knowlege earned.

As you found yourself, well get there, it is what it is and it will be handled,

Knocking the bearings out, no, plugs clean, det cans good on dyno, aki logged clear and a visual inspection (I pulled the heads ... yes really ) before we tracked....everything was as perfect as could be....and out AFR was fat and timing low, EGTs right in line (those are logged seperate, or I say can and were) Not totally blind, just partway.....

[boostedf22c]

Originally Posted by drooze

and out AFR was fat and timing low, EGTs right in line (those are logged seperate, or I say can and were) Not totally blind, just partway.....

If your AFR was fat, and timing was low, EGT's would be high, not "right in line" Your tuner should know this. Just FYI

And as far as your other choices, hey, it's your money and your car. It's just going to be hard for you to back up all the **** you talked if you keep making some of these decisions.

[art leong]

Originally Posted by boostedf22c

If your AFR was fat, and timing was low, EGT's would be high, not "right in line" Your tuner should know this. Just FYI

And as far as your other choices, hey, it's your money and your car. It's just going to be hard for you to back up all the **** you talked if you keep making some of these decisions.

I must have a severe case of brain fade. I think I remember "way back" in my turbo days.
I would add fuel to lower egt's. And my turbo cars all went up the track without a datalogger. The only way I could tune the car was with the adjustable fuel regulater
And the only data I got was from the EGT gauge. No wideband or anything else, but somehow or other I managed. Ronnie Sox, Bill Jenkins, And Don Nickolson seemed to get by without data loggers for a number of years
New cars go through a learning curve. As I mentioned in an earlier post I couldn't get past the starting line 2 weeks ago. A lot can go on in 11 runs as shown on DRC.
This was their first time out with a completely new car, they will get it right it just takes time

[boostedf22c]

Originally Posted by art leong

The only way I could tune the car was with the adjustable fuel regulater
And the only data I got was from the EGT gauge. No wideband or anything else, but somehow or other I managed. Ronnie Sox, Bill Jenkins, And Don Nickolson seemed to get by without data loggers for a number of years

You made due with what you had back in the day, as did many others, and most weren't EFI, big difference. When I first started turbocharging cars, it was much the same as you described. However, with the technology and products of today that you can take advantage of you no longer have to guess.

You also didn't have the internet where everyone is in everyones business to see how many problems people are really having...haha. I'm sure tons of people were blowing stuff up learning.

I understand the learning curve of a new car. Believe me.

And retarded timing = Higher EGT's. Regardless of A/F

[Chris "drooze" Wertman]

Originally Posted by boostedf22c

And retarded timing = Higher EGT's. Regardless of A/F

I NEVER said Retarded timing, NEVER, I said low, maybe it was a communication lapse you thinking I meant something I didnt.

These motors are just about PERFECT at 20.5-21 degrees total timing at WOT, period, just about anyone out there who knows these will tell you that , we were at 19 on 1 run 20 on another, thats what I mean we werent throwing 24 degrees at it, these heads have a stupid amount of flame travel. 20.5-21 seems to be the "Magic Number"

Low is "relative" I guess.

[boostedf22c]

Originally Posted by drooze

I NEVER said Retarded timing, NEVER, I said low, maybe it was a communication lapse you thinking I meant something I didnt.

These motors are just about PERFECT at 20.5-21 degrees total timing at WOT, period, just about anyone out there who knows these will tell you that , we were at 19 on 1 run 20 on another, thats what I mean we werent throwing 24 degrees at it, these heads have a stupid amount of flame travel. 20.5-21 seems to be the "Magic Number"

Low is "relative" I guess.

I'm glad to hear that you know what the perfect and magic numbers are. That paired with all the secret squirrel stuff has proved to be a killer combination.

[Chris "drooze" Wertman]

Originally Posted by boostedf22c

I'm glad to hear that you know what the perfect and magic numbers are. That paired with all the secret squirrel stuff has proved to be a killer combination.

I think there are about 20 other people running / building this engine that will tell you exactly what the total timing should be, Hemidup, Staton, Mopar, Irv, Doug Duell, Leo Meany and Big Stuff and on and on.....

So........thanks were glad we know it to.

You have obviously never built one of these engines, I did NOT do the bottom end on these 2 , simple time didnt allow and well, they were supposed to be good as it.

Glad somehow YOU can cast doubdts, its apparent only you can know something about something you know nothing about.

[art leong]

Originally Posted by boostedf22c

You made due with what you had back in the day, as did many others, and most weren't EFI, big difference. When I first started turbocharging cars, it was much the same as you described. However, with the technology and products of today that you can take advantage of you no longer have to guess.

You also didn't have the internet where everyone is in everyones business to see how many problems people are really having...haha. I'm sure tons of people were blowing stuff up learning.

I understand the learning curve of a new car. Believe me.

And retarded timing = Higher EGT's. Regardless of A/F

You are new here and don't know peoples backgrounds or what they run or have ran. My turbo dodges must have had some secret squirels firing the fuel injectors. Or was that EFI? I ran turbo stockers from the mid 90's till 2002 But I couldn't make them run any faster than 2 seconds under the index. I'm sure with some knowlege they should have run 5 seconds under.

[art leong]

Originally Posted by boostedf22c

You made due with what you had back in the day, as did many others, and most weren't EFI, big difference. When I first started turbocharging cars, it was much the same as you described. However, with the technology and products of today that you can take advantage of you no longer have to guess.

You also didn't have the internet where everyone is in everyones business to see how many problems people are really having...haha. I'm sure tons of people were blowing stuff up learning.

I understand the learning curve of a new car. Believe me.

And retarded timing = Higher EGT's. Regardless of A/F

You also stated that more fuel equaled higher EGT,s On a diesel maybe But not on the turbo cars I ran
You are new here and don't know peoples backgrounds or what they run or have ran. My turbo dodges must have had some secret squirels firing the fuel injectors. Or was that EFI? I ran turbo stockers from the mid 90's till 2002 But I couldn't make them run any faster than 2 seconds under the index. I'm sure with some knowlege they should have run 5 seconds under.

PS those fuel injection firing squirels have migrated to my Neon

[art leong]

One message for all the world champion typists.
These guys have had the car to the track ONCE, They had some bad breaks. I believe before we all tell them everything they did wrong. We should allow them some time.
Dooze and his Dad can now post in the section reserved for actual racers.