HOME FORUM RULES CONTACT
     
   
   

Go Back   CLASS RACER FORUM > Class Racer Forums > Stock and Super Stock
Register Photo Gallery FAQ Community Calendar

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 01-11-2010, 08:53 PM   #19
JMatt
Junior Member
 
JMatt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 87
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: How the factory "Package" cars may save Stock

Quote:
Originally Posted by Alan Roehrich View Post
You quoted me. It would be a logical conclusion that you were addressing something I said. However, it is now obvious that logic is not your strong suit. I read the whole thread. Several times. The point of the thread, according to the title ("How the factory "Package" cars may save Stock") and the original poster, is that somehow the new cars will save Stock. The fact that you wandered off on some sort of tangent bemoaning people gaming the AHFS, after posting some other nonsense, is your problem, not mine.
Apparently, nothing is your strong suit. Not reading comprehension, not logic, not intellect, nothing.

In post 13 you were the first to mention the AHFS.
In post 21 you first complained about the cars being underfactored.
In post 24 you complained that Drooze wouldn't be "respecting" other racers if he actually raced all 1320 feet instead of bagging it in 1000 feet.
In post 43 someone else complained about Drooze actually showing up at Pomona and RACING his car and getting HP added (an AHFS issue). Again chastizing him for not being "respectful" of cheaters who bag races at 1,000 feet. And "signing" his post on behalf of 98 DP owners (who apparently all want to cheat.)
In post 52 someone actually pointed out that AFHS won't work without people running their cars all out.
In post 65 you complained about the HP rating on the new cars (an AHFS issue).
So in post 70 I point out the two-faced arguments going on.
In post 78 you continue whining about HP factors (AHFS issue).
In post 83 I reply to you, pointing out the sum total of the above posts (because I can read).
Then in post 85 you complain that I brought up the AHFS and you hadn't said anything about it. Apparently Alzheimer's is also an issue you face.
In post 101 I suggested you re-read the thread.
So finally in post 104, after claiming you did rear the thread, multiple times, it's evident you simply cannot read, or cannot follow your own logic.

Why don't you try again?
JMatt is offline   Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:20 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.