HOME FORUM RULES CONTACT
     
   
   

Go Back   CLASS RACER FORUM > Class Racer Forums > .90 Heads Up Class Racing Tech
Register Photo Gallery FAQ Community Calendar

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-31-2009, 07:15 AM   #1
Chuck Westcott
Member
 
Chuck Westcott's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Brownsburg,Indiana
Posts: 326
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default M1 to M5

Anyone switched from M1 to M5 with any positive results?
What other changes did you make: IE- Timing/Jets.
Thanks
__________________
Chuck Westcott- S/C -S/G 225
Chuck Westcott is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-04-2010, 10:07 PM   #2
Mike Lawless
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: M1 to M5

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chuck Westcott View Post
Anyone switched from M1 to M5 with any positive results?
What other changes did you make: IE- Timing/Jets.
Thanks
I switched over last year. I made the mistake of just reading the advertising, ("just pour it in and get a performance increase!"). I did that and proceeded to burn off plug electrodes. I fattened it up as much as I could with the stuff I had on hand and managed to make it through the event without burning any more, but it was not running on top as well.
After doing some research, I found that most guys were adding 10-12% more fuel and getting good numbers. I felt my deal was lean anyway, so I added 15% and it picked up .06 seconds and 2mph over it's previous best ever run. I left the timing alone for a while, tried backing it off, but went back to my original setting which was 30° total.
I'm on the fence about using it this year for a couple reasons. It does run quicker, but it is WAY more expensive. In fact it's double the cost of straight methanol. ($5 vs over $10 per gal). It's a pain in the rear to get. I have to make a 90 mile round trip to get it. I can get straight stuff at the track or right across town. It seems also quite a bit more corrosive to aluminum stuff than straight methanol too. If I leave it in the system for a day or two after the race, there is some debris at the bottom of my fuel cell. I don't get that with straight methanol.
I reckon if you need a few hundredths, then it's worth a try. For an index guy like me, Not really necessary
Mike Lawless is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2010, 04:03 PM   #3
John DiBartolomeo
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Beaver Springs, PA
Posts: 494
Likes: 1
Liked 1,282 Times in 159 Posts
Default Re: M1 to M5

I switched from M1 to M3 when it first came out and after fattening the carb up roughly 10 jet numbers, we picked up almost a tenth. When VP came out with the M5, they said it was even better. Tried it - jetting up and down, timing in and out - and never saw any improvement over the M3. The people I spoke with who picked up with the M5 went from M1 to M5, so I can see the difference. The problem I had with the M5 was when you backed up after a dragster burnout, the fumes would kill you. I've gone back to the M3 but agree that it's hard to get. I use it in both of my dragsters and make sure I have a drum with me before we leave the shop. Generally, I believe the timing might not see much but it definitely requires jetting up. However, the timing issue theoretically should require changing because of the burn rate of the fuel, I just never saw anything. Call me if you'd like. -John D.
__________________
John DiBartolomeo
DRC Race Products
DragRacingActionOnline.com
John DiBartolomeo is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:18 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.