New rules for 2010?

Sean Cour · 09-22-2009, 04:56 PM

Twice, out of twelve teardowns. I understand what you're saying Ed, but if NHRA isn't going to enforce the rules that are written, and/or hand out performance gains. Then the indexes need to be adjusted.

Pretty simple to understand.

Sean Kennedy · 09-22-2009, 05:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sean Cour

Then the indexes need to be adjusted.

Why not adjust super stock indexes? Or BOTH classes? If it's good for the goose....

Sean Cour · 09-22-2009, 05:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sean Kennedy

Why not adjust super stock indexes? Or BOTH classes? If it's good for the goose....

Adjust away. What's with the paranoia? If you can't run the index, do like Ed says "cheat!" lol!

Sean Cour · 09-22-2009, 05:08 PM

Ed-

Well, I'm not saying that they will do it. But for Superstock, it's ridiculous when a "stocker" can run .80 under. That's what I'm trying to say.

Sean

09-22-2009, 04:56 PM	#1
Sean Cour Member Join Date: Jul 2009 Posts: 459 Likes: 171 Liked 125 Times in 40 Posts	Re: New rules for 2010? Twice, out of twelve teardowns. I understand what you're saying Ed, but if NHRA isn't going to enforce the rules that are written, and/or hand out performance gains. Then the indexes need to be adjusted. Pretty simple to understand.

09-22-2009, 05:08 PM	#4
Sean Cour Member Join Date: Jul 2009 Posts: 459 Likes: 171 Liked 125 Times in 40 Posts	Re: New rules for 2010? Ed- Well, I'm not saying that they will do it. But for Superstock, it's ridiculous when a "stocker" can run .80 under. That's what I'm trying to say. Sean