A/sa -1.37

X-TECH MAN · 09-04-2009, 05:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KEN BUGAJ

Bobby,
Speeds were bogus I'll say that. Everyone was playing games.
Defrank should have gone a 10.18 or so.
Richards is really fast I know.
What I was saying is that the new C-Jets are Killer and MUCH FASTER than people know.
Look for the A/SA C-Jets to run in the 9.70's

The Mustangs will be much faster as soon a someone pulls a motor and sets it up like the rest of the stockers. These are REAL stock engines and some do not even have the cams replaced yet. I would say 9:40's are not out of the question. Cant wait to see one run set up for Super Stock using current technology.

Mark Yacavone · 09-04-2009, 05:49 PM

Question: How does a AA/SA CJ go .35 faster than an A/SA CJ, when it's only, at the most, 200 and some odd lbs lighter?

bigshow2966 · 09-04-2009, 08:10 PM

100# is a tenth does not always apply, especially to little boosted motors.

Stephen & Horace Johnson · 09-04-2009, 10:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bigshow2966

100# is a tenth does not always apply, especially to little boosted motors.

I agree

Stephen Johnson #2162
Horace Johnson #2167
SS/D 427 Ford Fairlane NHRA-IHRA

Bob Pagano · 09-05-2009, 08:43 AM

If you all think they have not been inside these motors please send me what heck you all are smoking !

DavidExit29 · 09-04-2009, 10:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by X-TECH MAN

The Mustangs will be much faster as soon a someone pulls a motor and sets it up like the rest of the stockers. These are REAL stock engines and some do not even have the cams replaced yet. I would say 9:40's are not out of the question. Cant wait to see one run set up for Super Stock using current technology.

Agree, those things sounded like regular street cars when they drove by in the pits. Would have to say though that a few of the guys doing the work in the barn today seemed to know their way arround the engines pretty well, looked like they had been there before.

Stephen & Horace Johnson · 09-04-2009, 10:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by X-TECH MAN

The Mustangs will be much faster as soon a someone pulls a motor and sets it up like the rest of the stockers. These are REAL stock engines and some do not even have the cams replaced yet. I would say 9:40's are not out of the question. Cant wait to see one run set up for Super Stock using current technology.

Doesnt Rock Haas' car have current technology..its been 9.30s.

Stephen Johnson #2162
Horace Johnson #2167
SS/D 427 Ford Fairlane NHRA-IHRA

09-04-2009, 08:10 PM	#3
bigshow2966 Senior Member Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: chicago Posts: 656 Likes: 680 Liked 181 Times in 56 Posts	Re: A/sa -1.37 100# is a tenth does not always apply, especially to little boosted motors.

09-05-2009, 08:43 AM	#5
Bob Pagano VIP Member Join Date: Jun 2002 Location: New Holland, PA Mooresville,NC Posts: 1,163 Likes: 248 Liked 16 Times in 11 Posts	Re: A/sa -1.37 If you all think they have not been inside these motors please send me what heck you all are smoking ! __________________ Bob Pagano A/SA

09-04-2009, 05:49 PM	#2
Mark Yacavone Veteran Member Join Date: Mar 2002 Location: Miles From Nowhere Posts: 7,836 Likes: 2,930 Liked 5,148 Times in 1,965 Posts	Re: A/sa -1.37 Question: How does a AA/SA CJ go .35 faster than an A/SA CJ, when it's only, at the most, 200 and some odd lbs lighter? __________________ "We are lucky we don't get as much Government as we pay for." Will Rogers