|
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Lake Tapps, Washington
Posts: 137
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]()
The way I understand this rule after a long conversation with Bruce Bachelder is that if the hood in question was available from the factory in the year claimed and is "as per OEM" in construction; it's legal. Bruce gave me the impression that he didn't really like this ruling but it came from above. This was almost two years ago but the proliferation in "not really correct" hoods has been obvious since then and I haven't heard of any disqualifications. Remember; the year has to correct. I'd have an L-88 hood on Fred in about ten minutes if that weren't so. TT
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Georgetown, Indiana (close to Louisville, KY)
Posts: 779
Likes: 530
Liked 231 Times in 107 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
Are you saying I can run a L-88 hood on my 68 or 69 Vette? |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|