HOME FORUM RULES CONTACT
     
   
   

Go Back   CLASS RACER FORUM > Class Racer Forums > Stock and Super Stock
Register Photo Gallery FAQ Community Calendar

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-27-2009, 07:48 PM   #31
Mark Yacavone
Veteran Member
 
Mark Yacavone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Miles From Nowhere
Posts: 7,818
Likes: 2,909
Liked 5,126 Times in 1,954 Posts
Default Re: Common Sense GT car rules revision!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ed Wright View Post
Bobby DiDomenico said, "And count me in on the WORST red light deal. I've been told the fans wouldn't understand it."

Do you know that a lot of faster guys go ahead and leave when the slower car goes red? No need to sit there on the trans brake for nothing, you have already won. A lot of the second red lights would never happen if the rules were changed.
Ed , That may or may not be happening, but if it is ,that's one more advantage to the faster car . Doesn't sound like a good reason to NOT change the system.
...And ,could you do me a favor? Look on DRC for the last time someone left 1-2 seconds early, after the first car red-lighted.
__________________
"We are lucky we don't get as much Government as we pay for." Will Rogers
Mark Yacavone is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-27-2009, 07:49 PM   #32
Ed Fernandez
Veteran Member
 
Ed Fernandez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: NOO JOISEY nexta NOO YAWK
Posts: 5,879
Likes: 38
Liked 100 Times in 45 Posts
Default Re: Common Sense GT car rules revision!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lynn A McCarty View Post
Ed, Mark, I dont agree, Billy Meyer tried to do away with Sportsmen and it was a miserable failure. If S and SS was sold, people would buy it. Have you ever been to a NMCA race? The fans are crazy about it! I say lead or get out of the way! You know what you call someone who does everything the same and expect a different result? So if it fails one way, we try another.
Lynn,NHRA needs us for one thing.$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ NMCA/NHRA oranges and apples.Most of their program is fast heads up racing.Go there and see how much it costs to be competitive.They make Comp look like Jr dragster.
The answer to your question: Obama??
__________________
Former NHRA #1945
Former IHRA #1945
T/SA
Ed Fernandez is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-27-2009, 07:51 PM   #33
Lynn A McCarty
Member
 
Lynn A McCarty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Plainfield (INDY) Indiana
Posts: 468
Likes: 1
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Default Re: Common Sense GT car rules revision!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ed Fernandez View Post
Lynn,NHRA needs us for one thing.$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ NMCA/NHRA oranges and apples.Most of their program is fast heads up racing.Go there and see how much it costs to be competitive.They make Comp look like Jr dragster.
The answer to your question: Obama??
Yes or Foolish whichever you wanna pick. Why do you think I have been promoting heads up instead of boring 3 days of practice? However if the silent majority stays silent, nothing will happen.
__________________
Lynn A McCarty 3470 SS
Lynn A McCarty is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-27-2009, 09:19 PM   #34
Ed Fernandez
Veteran Member
 
Ed Fernandez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: NOO JOISEY nexta NOO YAWK
Posts: 5,879
Likes: 38
Liked 100 Times in 45 Posts
Default Re: Common Sense GT car rules revision!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lynn A McCarty View Post
Yes or Foolish whichever you wanna pick. Why do you think I have been promoting heads up instead of boring 3 days of practice? However if the silent majority stays silent, nothing will happen.
If I'm getting this right you're proposing going to running off indexes or national records.If so bye bye
S/SS.You will have the same 20 guys with deep pockets racing.Just like it was when the bracket format was introduced to raise participation levels.
__________________
Former NHRA #1945
Former IHRA #1945
T/SA
Ed Fernandez is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-27-2009, 09:42 PM   #35
Alan Roehrich
Veteran Member
 
Alan Roehrich's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Murfreesboro TN
Posts: 5,118
Likes: 1,573
Liked 1,837 Times in 417 Posts
Default Re: Common Sense GT car rules revision!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ed Fernandez View Post
If I'm getting this right you're proposing going to running off indexes or national records.If so bye bye
S/SS.You will have the same 20 guys with deep pockets racing.Just like it was when the bracket format was introduced to raise participation levels.
You're reading it wrong. Lynn is proposing class eliminations instead of time trials. Much like the SportsNational Open at Bowling Green. Instead of 2,3,4 or more time trials, you get one time trial, then they run class. It's an excellent idea really. Class gets contested, the spectators get to see some heads up no break out racing, and everyone still gets to run final eliminations.
__________________
Alan Roehrich
212A G/S

Last edited by Alan Roehrich; 06-27-2009 at 09:46 PM.
Alan Roehrich is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-27-2009, 09:51 PM   #36
bigshow2966
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: chicago
Posts: 654
Likes: 675
Liked 180 Times in 55 Posts
Question Re: Common Sense GT car rules revision!

Just asking, but what Mopar motors if any were rated higher with a hood scoop besides maybe the package cars? All the production motors had the same HP scoop or not.
bigshow2966 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-28-2009, 01:45 PM   #37
Lynn A McCarty
Member
 
Lynn A McCarty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Plainfield (INDY) Indiana
Posts: 468
Likes: 1
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Default Re: Common Sense GT car rules revision!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ed Fernandez View Post
If I'm getting this right you're proposing going to running off indexes or national records.If so bye bye
S/SS.You will have the same 20 guys with deep pockets racing.Just like it was when the bracket format was introduced to raise participation levels.
No silly, try to keep up . I propose we run heads up instead of 2-3 days of boring practice. Use a 5 cent CPU (pencil) if NHRA wants not to help, we organize it on our own. Just show up to practice with your index on the front windshield. Sunday, Sunday, Sunday will stay the same for all those 3 fans who want to watch such a thing.

Lynn
__________________
Lynn A McCarty 3470 SS
Lynn A McCarty is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-28-2009, 02:15 PM   #38
Lynn A McCarty
Member
 
Lynn A McCarty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Plainfield (INDY) Indiana
Posts: 468
Likes: 1
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Default Re: Common Sense GT car rules revision!

Quote:
Originally Posted by bigshow2966 View Post
Just asking, but what Mopar motors if any were rated higher with a hood scoop besides maybe the package cars? All the production motors had the same HP scoop or not.
Good point bigshow, our Max Wedge car has the same HP with or without the hood scoop as far as we can tell. Ron really cant afford a $5k alum hood, so no hood scoop for him either. No one can tell me that hood clearance and hoods scoops arent an issue. We had to make Ron''s plenum very small due to the lack of hood clearance. We also had to make the intake runner about an inch too short.

What I am saying is that if the guys run the Max Wedge or the 440 magnum in the GT car they should be able to incorporate the hood scoop how the engine came. Shaker or otherwise.
__________________
Lynn A McCarty 3470 SS

Last edited by Lynn A McCarty; 06-28-2009 at 02:17 PM.
Lynn A McCarty is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-28-2009, 04:54 PM   #39
John Kelley
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Tightwad,TEXAS
Posts: 911
Likes: 6
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Default Re: Common Sense GT car rules revision!

NHRA should just lower the HP Factor for the "ram air" in bodies without a SCOOP.....problem solved.\
And a LOT less hassle on legality of the proper scoop..........geesh
John Kelley is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-28-2009, 06:17 PM   #40
Ed Fernandez
Veteran Member
 
Ed Fernandez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: NOO JOISEY nexta NOO YAWK
Posts: 5,879
Likes: 38
Liked 100 Times in 45 Posts
Default Re: Common Sense GT car rules revision!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lynn A McCarty View Post
No silly, try to keep up . I propose we run heads up instead of 2-3 days of boring practice. Use a 5 cent CPU (pencil) if NHRA wants not to help, we organize it on our own. Just show up to practice with your index on the front windshield. Sunday, Sunday, Sunday will stay the same for all those 3 fans who want to watch such a thing.

Lynn
I would like to see a format like that.But would NHRA go for it?I think you would hear"Sounds good,but it would take too long due to the time lost with the handicap starts".Would there be payouts for the class winners or just the satisfaction of winning class?How about the dreaded AHFS?
__________________
Former NHRA #1945
Former IHRA #1945
T/SA
Ed Fernandez is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:00 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.