HOME FORUM RULES CONTACT
     
   
   

Go Back   CLASS RACER FORUM > Class Racer Forums > Stock and Super Stock
Register Photo Gallery FAQ Community Calendar

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-26-2009, 10:13 PM   #11
bill dedman
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Conway, AR
Posts: 1,739
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times in 4 Posts
Default Re: Common Sense GT car rules revision!

That's just about the most illogical hing I ever heard.

The HP factor is on the motor that's going to be RACED, and if it had fresh air, that's a part of its factor.

Depriving a motor of a scoop that was factored as a fresh air engine is changing the parameters of how it makes power and invalidates the veracity of the factor.

But, I forget; it's NHRA.... the folks that gave us Hydramatics in Chevy sedan deliveries (and the subsequent total ban) and a 30+ year ban on 3-speed automatics in (some) cars that came with one (Turboglide.)

I forget what kind of minds I'm dealing with, here...
__________________
Bill

Last edited by bill dedman; 06-26-2009 at 10:44 PM.
bill dedman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2009, 10:42 PM   #12
Ed Fernandez
Veteran Member
 
Ed Fernandez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: NOO JOISEY nexta NOO YAWK
Posts: 5,879
Likes: 38
Liked 100 Times in 45 Posts
Default Re: Common Sense GT car rules revision!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lynn A McCarty View Post
I still think stock and super stock is a very valuable untapped resource. You could have said the same thing about NASCAR 30 years ago. If you dont sell it.....it will never be sold. Anyway I think the rule change suggestion would make hypo engines in the GT applications make way more common sense.
In todays world the kids that would normally be coming into our sport are not interested.There are too many things to do other than spend money they don't have on the bottomless pit S/SS is becoming.they
buy Hondas now,not GM,Ford,Mopar etc.
And look at NASCAR.Their fanbase (theout) is deteriorting,no good old boy drivers,a world car and supposedly in the future a world engine.Sound like Pro Stock??????????????

Ed
__________________
Former NHRA #1945
Former IHRA #1945
T/SA
Ed Fernandez is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-27-2009, 01:14 AM   #13
Jeff Lee
VIP Member
 
Jeff Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Anthem, Arizona
Posts: 2,766
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Default Re: Common Sense GT car rules revision!

pinks: all out
__________________
Jeff Lee 7494 D/S '70 AMX
Jeff Lee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-27-2009, 04:51 AM   #14
Mike Taylor 3601
VIP Member
 
Mike Taylor 3601's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Somerset,Ky
Posts: 1,372
Likes: 357
Liked 308 Times in 103 Posts
Default Re: Common Sense GT car rules revision!

I'll class race as long as I can and there is a place,I know people who have raced twenty years and don't
have a clue about stock,super stock,or comp and don't want to know about it,believe me I tried to explain
and get them interested.You can tell them about cars like Jerry Hemingson's B/A run 4.50s W/ 390''s SBC 5 years ago,[have to explain it's nat. aspirated] they don't care cause so&so runs 4.40's W/ 706 &2stages NOS.,or you get the most offensive to me response,He could run Top Sportsman with that.
They don't relate to how fast a car is by cubic inches/weight/resrictions they just see ET and don't care
how you did it in there mind lower ET =better car.That is how majority of drag fans think,most don't know
what a super stocker is let alone GT car.I do think you right about scoops going w/engine Lynn,sorry
if got of course.The class racer or anything else in this country that requires thinking or work is dying
and I don't like it.
Mike Taylor3601
Mike Taylor 3601 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-27-2009, 08:48 AM   #15
Bobby DiDomenico
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 924
Likes: 103
Liked 101 Times in 52 Posts
Default Re: Common Sense GT car rules revision!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mark Yacavone View Post
Please... We already have FWD conversions. To the average fan, they don't even sound right without a fartcan.
Good one Mark!!
Bobby DiDomenico is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-27-2009, 09:08 AM   #16
Bobby DiDomenico
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 924
Likes: 103
Liked 101 Times in 52 Posts
Wink Re: Common Sense GT car rules revision!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lynn A McCarty View Post
We all notice that GT cars usually run engines with the most favorable HP that is a given. However, what I have never understood is when a hypo engine is rated with factory Ram Air, why dont they allow us to run the factory hood scoop? There certainly isnt any credit for killing our intake height or losing fresh air.

Dont you guys think that if a car's engine came with Ram Air we should be able to incorporate the original hood scoop on the GT car? IE 428 CJ should get the shaker hood they were rated with. 440 magnum should get the 440 magnum hood scoop.

I think it would be way cool to let the fans know that it is the new car with the appropriate engine dynamics!

Lynn,

An interesting idea, but on some cars, the scoop assembly is worth more than the 2 barrel version of the entire car. And some won't fit given that every new car looks the same, like a bubble thing. What if we make all new GT cars have working air that they came with? Now that would be COOL!

And count me in on the WORST red light deal. I've been told the fans wouldn't understand it. Heck, there are commentators on TV each week talking about races won or lost on "Reaction time" when in fact what is measured is "car movment time" not the drivers reaction!!

Get me the Stage 2 455 GS legal in Stock and I'm getting you the hood scoops buddy. I know this guy who ran one a few years back and the crowds went wild, seems they didn't know folks raced cars other than Chevys....
Bobby DiDomenico is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-27-2009, 09:30 AM   #17
Dick Butler
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Richmond Indiana
Posts: 1,196
Likes: 5
Liked 32 Times in 19 Posts
Default Re: Common Sense GT car rules revision!

Good Luck Lynn, I hear you as a voice in the "dark" when it comes to asking for reasonable change and reasonable thought from NHRA. I respect your continued excitement and support for Class racing and S and SS but the whole "picture" has changed in the Auto industry, economy, life styles of youth and unless restarted from Zero by an new organization our form of excitement is a fond memory.
Choices are 1) keep going and "participating" when ever Class is run and run points meets as a participant without caring no one comes to see (for 1000 reasons)
2) keep hoping NHRA will have an attack of common sense or Crisis and develop a need for a crowd who likes S and SS.
3) sell your stuff when appropriate and take up a hobby where no one controls your goals and participation with the stroke of an ignorant pen.
I personally chose #3. I have a cruise in 409. I take it out of the garage " when I want to" I drive it WHERE I want to. I take it where hundreds of people love it too and respect it for its history. I do not compete with any rules or governance. I just GO there on my schedule or NOT. I control ALL my hobby. I even work on it IF I want to not in a hurry to arrive or get a parking spot or a campground. I eat at the booths, get a sunburn, visit fellow car lovers and look at old AMERICAN car parts and cars.
I am much more relaxed as I only deal with my rules of go "if I want to do it, I go."
Good Luck!
Dick Butler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-27-2009, 09:32 AM   #18
Angelo DiTocco
Senior Member
 
Angelo DiTocco's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: NY, NY
Posts: 750
Likes: 175
Liked 189 Times in 48 Posts
Default Re: Common Sense GT car rules revision!

What about this for a GT rule change?

The FWD conversions get to do a lot of cool front end mods.... I particularly like the fact that they have tube frame rails and tube control arms / tabs / heims/ etc... like a comp car. I'm sure it makes them a lot safer than if the factory k-frame and stamped control arms were used. There's also more room for headers, oil pan width etc.. I think it makes the cars a little easier to work on too.

Any way my question is this - -

I wonder if the NHRA tech dept would ever consider allowing a traditional RWD car to redo the front end in a similar manner. Eliminate the factory K-member and control arms & replace it with tube and mounts for tubular control arms. Maybe even eliminate the upper arm and replace the upright with a sanhuff strut. Firewall wouldn't be an issue. It would also save some weight. It is a radical idea, but it seems like the next logical step considering what the FwD conversions are allowed to do.

Thoughts? Opinions?
__________________
Angelo DiTocco
'98 Firebird SS/HA
'98 Firebird B/SA

Last edited by Angelo DiTocco; 06-27-2009 at 09:35 AM.
Angelo DiTocco is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-27-2009, 10:17 AM   #19
X-TECH MAN
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Lake Placid, Florida
Posts: 3,203
Likes: 1,047
Liked 235 Times in 110 Posts
Talking Re: Common Sense GT car rules revision!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dick Butler View Post
Good Luck Lynn, I hear you as a voice in the "dark" when it comes to asking for reasonable change and reasonable thought from NHRA. I respect your continued excitement and support for Class racing and S and SS but the whole "picture" has changed in the Auto industry, economy, life styles of youth and unless restarted from Zero by an new organization our form of excitement is a fond memory.
Choices are 1) keep going and "participating" when ever Class is run and run points meets as a participant without caring no one comes to see (for 1000 reasons)
2) keep hoping NHRA will have an attack of common sense or Crisis and develop a need for a crowd who likes S and SS.
3) sell your stuff when appropriate and take up a hobby where no one controls your goals and participation with the stroke of an ignorant pen.
I personally chose #3. I have a cruise in 409. I take it out of the garage " when I want to" I drive it WHERE I want to. I take it where hundreds of people love it too and respect it for its history. I do not compete with any rules or governance. I just GO there on my schedule or NOT. I control ALL my hobby. I even work on it IF I want to not in a hurry to arrive or get a parking spot or a campground. I eat at the booths, get a sunburn, visit fellow car lovers and look at old AMERICAN car parts and cars.
I am much more relaxed as I only deal with my rules of go "if I want to do it, I go."
Good Luck!
#1....lol
#2.....NHRA....Common Sence.....Ha ha Ho Ho Heh heh
#3....now your talking sence. There IS life after Drag Racing NHRA style and its a good one.
X-TECH MAN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-27-2009, 11:45 AM   #20
Urraco
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 66
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: Common Sense GT car rules revision!

Recognition for S/SS aint never gonna happen guys. As long as NHRA has 2 of the cookie cutter fuel cars running, they are going to push them down the throats of the fans. Remember, they are ALLOWING us to race according to them.
Urraco is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:33 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.