|
![]() |
#31 |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Sheboygan Wi
Posts: 391
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times in 2 Posts
|
![]()
X-Tech-Man & Alex, This is got to happen ! As i hope that i live long enough to play along as i did at the class Nationals You guys are doing just GREAT!!!!!!!!! John Lang
__________________
John Lang 365 STK, SS |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#32 |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Lake Placid, Florida
Posts: 3,203
Likes: 1,047
Liked 235 Times in 110 Posts
|
![]()
[QUOTE=Jack McCarthy;108469]what rules do we go to in case of mulitple rules ?
like pistons, slick size etc ? thats the only big issue i see Hummmm, you guys tell me what you want. I personally always thought the NHRA piston rule was BS. I like IHRA' s or the way the old stockers from the late '60's and early 70's had thier piston rule. It wasnt any more expensive to buy these pistons and a hell of lot eaiser to police. Id say use 9"inch tires on the stockers but 10 inch tires last longer but are slower and dont fit some wheel wells as easily. As far as Im concerened its open for discussion. Maybe Alex will say different?? Its going to be YOUR association. I guess this is a good time to state your likes and dislikes about both NHRA and IHRA rules. At first the rules should be close to both associations but the lack of inspections in IHRA and the lack of interest from NHRA is something that needs to be dealt with. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#33 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]()
Unk:
Call me at 501-767-4777. I'm not sure how to use the PM deal. S.E. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#34 | |
VIP Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Dunnellon,FL
Posts: 1,103
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times in 4 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
There is a ground swell of people that want to bring back the old "junior stock" from the '70's. The days of high winding small blocks and tri-five chevy's but of course there is no place to race these cars, Perhaps this would give them an opportunity. Jim |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#35 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Anthem, Arizona
Posts: 2,766
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
|
![]()
If I had my own series and I wanted something that would do well in a "Pinks" style TV show, I would use "regular" NHRA / IHRA class guides and combine 3 concurrent classes on a similar weight break like Top Stock. Sticks & auto's heads up racing just like you would find in the streets.
So all the ABC cars would compete heads up, the DEF cars, GHI cars, etc. I think it would be great racing, great spectator appeal and great on camera. Applies to Stock & Superstock. No Top Stock rules would apply to the regular classes. Weight breaks might be an issue on 1/2# vs. 1# but if you can't get around an issue like that don't race.
__________________
Jeff Lee 7494 D/S '70 AMX |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#36 |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Lake Placid, Florida
Posts: 3,203
Likes: 1,047
Liked 235 Times in 110 Posts
|
![]()
IHRA has allowed the older cars for years. The pure stock class is just like the old Jr. stockers and yes we plan on having a place for them in the class racers association but be prepared for tear down inspections if you run one of them.
Last edited by X-TECH MAN; 03-04-2009 at 06:06 AM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#37 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: wv
Posts: 884
Likes: 42
Liked 56 Times in 21 Posts
|
![]()
i like the old pure stock no headers no slicks etc
__________________
Vic Guilmino 1129 STK |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#38 |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Sheboygan Wi
Posts: 391
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times in 2 Posts
|
![]()
Keep the tire rule at 9" ! Use the NHRA & IHRA classes alike for stk and ss, my suggestion! John....
__________________
John Lang 365 STK, SS |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#39 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Nineveh, Indiana
Posts: 512
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
The view I'm taking, you're cross polinating here, so some cars have already been built under one rule structure. Some might take it that using the IHRA rules makes it more liberal. The 9 inch tire really won't bother me, that's been my plan from the beginning. As I've stated, I'm building a crate motor car. I do want to keep it within the confines of NHRA rules, in case I decide one day to build a 301 Pontiac or 403 Oldsmobile motor. To me that's another issue, what about those of us that populate these classes, crate motor and GT. Since I can't run NHRA events with this car as a crate motor or GT stocker. My option to use the rules that are allowed, give me a little more leeway than the guy running a car that competes in NHRA. If I chose to take advantage of them. Robert Swartz
__________________
Robert Swartz - Swartz & Lane 66 Chevy II Pro 95 Achieva EF/SA, 78 Mustang II U/SA (work in progress) #354 stock Last edited by Robert Swartz; 03-04-2009 at 03:49 PM. Reason: spelling |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#40 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 589
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]()
I couldn't agree more. If you want fat tires, narrowed rearends and moved in frame rails theres Super stock. It ain't stock. Course you could still run stocker tires but it could be a handfull with the narrow track. Sort of like driving with one of those inflateaspares on.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|