|
|
![]() |
#1 |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Lake Placid, Florida
Posts: 3,203
Likes: 1,047
Liked 235 Times in 110 Posts
|
![]()
Why not get rid of the multi-million dollar Pro Stock class as we know it and replace it with cars and class rule/structure that already exists......Its now called TOP STOCK. Old and new body styles, carbs and FI. REAL cars not some tubed framed frankinstine that only a few can afford and even they cant run without big sponsorships. One controling factor.....HP ratings and the need of real and extensive inspections. Brings back 1970 (almost) all over again when anyone could almost afford to race in Pro Stock. Just my 2 cents.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Lake Placid, Florida
Posts: 3,203
Likes: 1,047
Liked 235 Times in 110 Posts
|
![]()
P.S. Dont forget the wheelstands and the shifting of gears that get the fans turned on......something that todays Pro Stock dosent have.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Hanover, MA
Posts: 430
Likes: 3
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
![]()
Kinda like what's old is new again. Maybe a Top Stk, Jr Stk, Hemi shootout and Top SS with a Jr SS added. The only downside might be it could lead to dropping the traditional SS and Stk classes at Nat'ls. This is almost a be careful what you wish for scenario. Another problem is these types of classes would require a full teardown to keep things in line which takes a pile of time for all involved. But then there are those who will say tear them all apart every time.
__________________
Doug Blackley 1697 STK |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Conway, AR
Posts: 1,739
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times in 4 Posts
|
![]()
Thanks for the responses; looks like I'm not the only one who thinks that there needs to be some kind of change to the Pro Stock program to freshen it up and generate some new excitement.
I do think that if they're going to call it Pro Stock (and, I can't imagine that they'd change the name after nearly 40 years), that it should remain a Professional category, and as such, must retain the mechanical excellence that it now enjoys, which will mean it will continue to be a class that requires money in large amounts to be competitive in. Carbon fiber this and Titanum that will continue to be "de rigueur" on the better cars, and it will be hard to build a competitive car without such materials. Engine choices will depend on the rules, and the rules right now are restrictive to the point that it's cookie cutter all the way. Boring, to me. Those engines all put out an incredible amount of power for what they are, but since they are all alike and equally powerful within a few HP of each other, it's a driver's race.... and that's the boring part, for me. It gets down to who can cut a light, and I don't find a good guess on the tree as exciting as watching two very different engines, with very different specs, race each other, heads-up. Instead of two basic engine designs competing for Pro Stock money, they could have ten different combinations, from multi-valve turbocharged engines to supercharged hemis, to unblown mountain motors, not unlike what the IHRA Pro Stockers are famous for. Fuel injection should be a "no penalty" option. But, what do I know??? It just seems that Pro Stock as it exists today, is not a very exciting program, at least, to me. Not much is going to happen until the economy picks up, probably... if then. Too bad; we need it now.
__________________
Bill Last edited by bill dedman; 01-29-2009 at 03:10 AM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Oneonta.,NY
Posts: 889
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]()
I just want to point out that the class the innovative guy is racing in is comp!
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Canyon, Tx
Posts: 551
Likes: 127
Liked 353 Times in 102 Posts
|
![]()
If you want to make it exciting for the fans just limit the wheelbase and make it full body late model production cars on gasoline.
Anything Else Goes... It would be expensive to run but it would be heads up, fast, and exciting for the fans. Its already expensive to run as it stands today. My 2 Cents |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: NOO JOISEY nexta NOO YAWK
Posts: 5,879
Likes: 38
Liked 100 Times in 45 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
that more heads up (you know who you are) will be the savior of S/SS and include us in the "big show".Well that's Comp and they're in the same boat as us.But boy do they pump money into the black hole compared to us. Ed F.
__________________
Former NHRA #1945 Former IHRA #1945 T/SA |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
VIP Member
|
![]()
Bill, what I'd like to know is what happened to Buddy Ingersolls Twin Turboed Buick Regal, that was banned from NHRA Pro Stock racing because it out-ran the 500 ci guys by at least two tenths? Competition Eliminator may get cars like his nowadays, but I watched a video on You Tube where he gave a V8 Pro Stocker about 1.5 car lengths, and ran it down at the stripe!!! I miss that car, because it gave a valid argument to the phrase "no replacement for displacement"....
__________________
Gary Hampton '86 Z24,173 V6 CF/S #5824 (#78 in 2021) |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 | |
VIP Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Richmond Hill, Georgia
Posts: 2,003
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
![]() Quote:
And you don't get any Television coverage for a big buck sponsor to pay the bills.
__________________
Art Leong 2095 SS |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Oneonta.,NY
Posts: 889
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]()
and back me up on this Steve-not all comp racers are wealthy!
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|