HOME FORUM RULES CONTACT
     
   
   

Go Back   CLASS RACER FORUM > Class Racer Forums > Stock and Super Stock

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-15-2008, 12:22 PM   #1
Woodro Josey
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 805
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 1 Post
Default Re: Cylinder Head Runner Volumes

Its like closing the barn door after all of the cows have left the farm.

Tech Man you are so right!
__________________
Woodro Josey 2002 STK
Woodro Josey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-15-2008, 12:56 PM   #2
Myron Piatek
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,542
Likes: 34
Liked 138 Times in 51 Posts
Cool Re: Cylinder Head Runner Volumes

Legitimizing "acid" porting or not, at least there will be a set number. It's been brought up here many times that the "higher ups" don't want to go through any more time, trouble and cost in tech than they have to. So bit by bit, the rules have been "generalized". (i.e.: stock cam lift but any duration, any spring pressure, etc.) Porting concerns/violations have been based on the tech person's interpretation anyway which can be difficult to prove or disprove by either party. With a set cc number, hopefully somewhat less than SS, at least there will be a clear limit. (I don't know how close the SS cc's are to average as-cast OEM numbers.) If they don't emphasize the as-cast port texture, perhaps that would reduce costs because any massaging wouldn't have to be covered up, which is where a lot of expense is. Of course, it would still be possible to weld, recontour, etc. and cover that up. There will always be people with the money and resources to get around any rules. But overall it should reduce the difference between the top and bottom qualifiers.

The down side is that Stock will be a little more like SS. But I would hope there will be enough differences to keep them seperate.
__________________
LOCOMOTION Racing
Myron Piatek is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-15-2008, 01:31 PM   #3
zracer305
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 108
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Angry Re: Cylinder Head Runner Volumes

You know I'm done with NHRA and done building an NHRA stocker. You will soon see all of stuff on sale in the classifieds. I'll build my car to NHRA standards safety wise and just build a 10.60 car to run PSCA.
zracer305 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-15-2008, 02:12 PM   #4
442OLDS
VIP Member
 
442OLDS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Elgin,IL
Posts: 1,340
Likes: 5
Liked 282 Times in 103 Posts
Question Re: Cylinder Head Runner Volumes

Quote:
Originally Posted by zracer305 View Post
You know I'm done with NHRA and done building an NHRA stocker.
Why?
442OLDS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-15-2008, 03:03 PM   #5
zracer305
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 108
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Angry Re: Cylinder Head Runner Volumes

Quote:
Originally Posted by 442OLDS View Post
Why?
NHRA has no idea what they want to do. Rules on cylinder heads change every year. I was just quoated by an engine builder 1800.00 for a set of sbc stocker heads. If the rules say stock heads what modifications are they doing that cost 1800.00? I can buy a set of AFR 227 aluminum heads complete on ebay for 1500.00. I'm just sick of it.
zracer305 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:29 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.