|
|
|
|
12-27-2022, 11:41 AM
|
#1 |
|
VIP Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Elgin,IL
Posts: 1,339
Likes: 5
Liked 282 Times in 103 Posts
|
Re: Most Egregiously Enhanced or Under Rated Combo ???
Okay,I'll add another one .
When an LS1 engine that is in A/SA in some cars goes into a 2004 GTO and fits E/SA or F/SA,it should be pretty fast And it is. |
|
|
| Liked |
|
12-27-2022, 12:50 PM
|
#2 |
|
VIP Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: LONG ISLAND N.Y.
Posts: 1,676
Likes: 3,380
Liked 1,820 Times in 425 Posts
|
Re: Most Egregiously Enhanced or Under Rated Combo ???
Most under rated is 1982-1985 carburetor 305 Camaro
RED camaros with special front bumper that magically make 12 HP disappear by Wednesday Yes I said it Next !
__________________
james perrone 1290 STK |
|
|
|
| Liked |
|
12-27-2022, 01:00 PM
|
#3 |
|
Live Reporter
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Hickory, Ky
Posts: 10,637
Likes: 1,929
Liked 10,699 Times in 2,228 Posts
|
Re: Most Egregiously Enhanced or Under Rated Combo ???
I'm a big FE fan
|
|
|
|
| Liked |
|
12-27-2022, 02:03 PM
|
#4 |
|
VIP Member
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Shelby, NC
Posts: 1,823
Likes: 2,166
Liked 2,353 Times in 554 Posts
|
Re: Most Egregiously Enhanced or Under Rated Combo ???
Those 2015 Challengers and 1970 Cudas are on my list...
__________________
Daren Poole-Adams NHRA Stock/SS 2007 |
|
|
|
12-27-2022, 02:35 PM
|
#5 |
|
VIP Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Richmond Hill GA (and Port Ludlow WA)
Posts: 4,295
Likes: 2,382
Liked 3,174 Times in 971 Posts
|
Re: Most Egregiously Enhanced or Under Rated Combo ???
C’mon guys, a little more Christmas spirit is in order LOL
__________________
Jim Carter 2340 Super Stock 2340 SST/2340 Stock Set another place at the table |
|
|
|
|
12-27-2022, 07:47 PM
|
#6 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Warsaw, Mo
Posts: 719
Likes: 640
Liked 1,144 Times in 354 Posts
|
Re: Most Egregiously Enhanced or Under Rated Combo ???
Wow, some of you guys take this stuff way to serious, I guess I am just the guy that gives you that easy round win, but hey I have fun win or loose. Me and my Brother build our own stuff, this year I am going to put a .013 stroke crank, lighter rocker arms, tighter deck, and a new cam and hope to run .75 under will be happy. No funny stuff on the heads. Brother Bob has probably built more engines then most on this forum, a true machinist actually knows how to hold a micrometer, maybe not a horse power guru but his stuff stays together.
Randy Wells I/S 5628 |
|
|
|
| Liked |
|
12-27-2022, 03:14 PM
|
#7 | |
|
VIP Member
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Derby City, USA
Posts: 3,637
Likes: 1,083
Liked 7,936 Times in 1,518 Posts
|
Re: Most Egregiously Enhanced or Under Rated Combo ???
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
| Liked |
|
12-27-2022, 05:35 PM
|
#8 |
|
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Miles From Nowhere
Posts: 7,815
Likes: 2,903
Liked 5,120 Times in 1,951 Posts
|
Re: Most Egregiously Enhanced or Under Rated Combo ???
Great. I tried to help.
Now we've got Mr. No Name pitting named racers against one another. You want me to see if I can get ol' H.P. to kill this thread like he did to the musclecar thread?
__________________
"We are lucky we don't get as much Government as we pay for." Will Rogers |
|
|
|
| Liked |
|
12-27-2022, 06:55 PM
|
#9 | |
|
Veteran Member
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Murfreesboro TN
Posts: 5,112
Likes: 1,570
Liked 1,818 Times in 413 Posts
|
Re: Most Egregiously Enhanced or Under Rated Combo ???
Quote:
Named racers can only be pitted against each other if they take the bait and allow it. It's stink bait, just sniff it, and swim away.
__________________
Alan Roehrich 212A G/S |
|
|
|
|
| Liked |
|
12-27-2022, 07:44 PM
|
#10 | |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Re: Most Egregiously Enhanced or Under Rated Combo ???
Quote:
Last edited by Barry Polley; 12-27-2022 at 07:46 PM. Reason: I’m old….. |
|
|
|
| Liked |
 |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
