65-85 under.

[Kdw1403]

Well that sucks. Am I correct in assuming lots of people will be running slower than they used to on purpose?

[Kdw1403]

How many runs over 84.9 under trigger a review?

[1347]

Originally Posted by Kdw1403

How many runs over 84.9 under trigger a review?

none, it has to be 2 of 1.00 or more, until it gets to 1.300

[SDT1DYI]

Originally Posted by Kdw1403

Well that sucks. Am I correct in assuming lots of people will be running slower than they used to on purpose?

I would expect there will be a lot of discussions in the Lanes before Heads up runs about running to 1,000 ft. The Q sheet will seldom see a 1.0 under #1 qualifer. There will be a bunch seperated by only a couple of thou in the 849 to 825 range.
Calling Stock Eliminator a performance class is in question with these changes.

Steve Teeter Stk/SS 620

[Billy Nees]

Originally Posted by SDT1DYI

Calling Stock Eliminator a performance class is in question with these changes.

Steve Teeter Stk/SS 620

Calling Stock Eliminator "Stock Eliminator" is in question also with all of the changes.

[GUMP]

Originally Posted by Billy Nees

Calling Stock Eliminator "Stock Eliminator" is in question also with all of the changes.

Alas, it's all we have!

[Mike Pearson]

lots of racers have been asking for the AHFS to be changed. Now there is a change. You can still run as fast as you want. You just have to pay the price with a HP hit if you go too fast. I think this is a better situation than lowering the indexes across the board again. I am not sure why the runs under .65 do not count toward the average. All runs except aborted or incomplete runs should be counted.
People complain all the time about 1000 ft racing. Run your cars all out and take the hit and then you can run the full 1/4 mile. Might take a few hits for some combos. People have been playing the game so long that they have gotten used to it as the norm.