Bill Bader Jr. "we are going to open"

[Mark Yacavone]

Originally Posted by Bruce Noland

You really should spend some time researching these subjects before coming out here with this nonsense.

Anybody see an answer here?
v
v
v
v
v
v
v
v
Maybe down here .
Nope
So, if I wanted to research the Constitution, I'd check in with Mark Levin.
Or, how about Jonathan Turley, a Democrat , for a different angle?
Certainly wouldn't be from your source, that foremost constitutional scholar, what was his name.., the guy with the phony papers..Barry something? O'Biden?

[jwsamuel]

Originally Posted by Mark Yacavone

So, if I wanted to research the Constitution, I'd check in with Mark Levin.

You could read it yourself.

[Bruce Noland]

Originally Posted by Mark Yacavone

Anybody see an answer here?
v
v
v
v
v
v
v
v
Maybe down here .
Nope
So, if I wanted to research the Constitution, I'd check in with Mark Levin.
Or, how about Jonathan Turley, a Democrat , for a different angle?
Certainly wouldn't be from your source, that foremost constitutional scholar, what was his name.., the guy with the phony papers..Barry something? O'Biden?

Fluff master. You offered nothing worthy of an answer. Go do some research. I guess you remember that Jonathan Turleley was on Trump's defense team.

[Mark Yacavone]

Originally Posted by Bruce Noland

. I guess you remember that Jonathan Turleley was on Trump's defense team.

So? Only because he was correct.

I've done some. It looks like DT could try it, during wartime (as Cumo called it) In that case the SCOTUS would have to take it up. Then , they would defer to the contagious disease folks and the military, before making a decision.
I asked you if you would support such a move, if it saved a few lives. You called me names, but still haven't answered.

[Chevy55]

Originally Posted by Mark Yacavone

So? Only because he was correct.

I've done some. It looks like DT could try it, during wartime (as Cumo called it) In that case the SCOTUS would have to take it up. Then , they would defer to the contagious disease folks and the military, before making a decision.
I asked you if you would support such a move, if it saved a few lives. You called me names, but still haven't answered.

"And even if the U.S. legislative and executive branches could sufficiently cooperate to buy some additional time by delaying the next election, they wouldn’t have much leeway. The 20th amendment to the U.S. constitution states that the current president’s four-year term ends at noon on Jan. 20. So the election couldn’t be put off by much more than two months without incurring the risk of leaving the U.S. without a president or vice president come Jan. 20, and leaving Congress the chaotic task of having the Speaker of the House temporarily govern while figuring out how to rectify the absence of a duly-elected chief executive. (Altering that Jan. 20 deadline would require amending the U.S. Constitution in a matter of months, a virtually impossible feat.)"
https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/pr...ion-postponed/


So with your plan that little old lady from Pasadena will be President come Jan 20th.
That'll rattle your cage, I love it!!! LOL

[BRETV]

Why are you guys on the left worrying about saving all these lives now, as you kill thousands of babies a day. Why don't you stop that!! ya,in?






Bret Velde
2003 FS/??

[Mark Yacavone]

Originally Posted by BRETV

Why are you guys on the left worrying about saving all these lives now, as you kill thousands of babies a day. Why don't you stop that!! ya,in?






Bret Velde
2003 FS/??

I'll answer for them...Petty, partisan politics.

[Mark Yacavone]

Originally Posted by Chevy55

"And even if the U.S. legislative and executive branches could sufficiently cooperate to buy some additional time by delaying the next election, they wouldn’t have much leeway. The 20th amendment to the U.S. constitution states that the current president’s four-year term ends at noon on Jan. 20. So the election couldn’t be put off by much more than two months without incurring the risk of leaving the U.S. without a president or vice president come Jan. 20, and leaving Congress the chaotic task of having the Speaker of the House temporarily govern while figuring out how to rectify the absence of a duly-elected chief executive. (Altering that Jan. 20 deadline would require amending the U.S. Constitution in a matter of months, a virtually impossible feat.)"
https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/pr...ion-postponed/


So with your plan that little old lady from Pasadena will be President come Jan 20th.
That'll rattle your cage, I love it!!! LOL

Take you left wing links and shove them, Mr.?????
(Bruce , a no-name , non -racer..Get on it)

[Bruce Noland]

Originally Posted by Mark Yacavone

So? Only because he was correct.

I've done some. It looks like DT could try it, during wartime (as Cumo called it) In that case the SCOTUS would have to take it up. Then , they would defer to the contagious disease folks and the military, before making a decision.
I asked you if you would support such a move, if it saved a few lives. You called me names, but still haven't answered.

He can't do it period. All this stuff is fluff and you know it. I'm for saving lives by voting by mail. I suppose you're against that eh?

[Mark Yacavone]

Originally Posted by Bruce Noland

He can't do it period. All this stuff is fluff and you know it. I'm for saving lives by voting by mail. I suppose you're against that eh?

Yes, because I'm against voter fraud. It's still rampant where people come in, in person.