|
![]() |
#1 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: New Brunswick, Canada
Posts: 69
Likes: 1
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]()
I've been reading some old threads about 1979-1993 302 Mustangs on here. Seems like nobody even wants to acknowledge the existence of the 86. Just curious what the reason for the Rodney Dangerfield treatment? (can't get no respect) Thanks
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 270
Likes: 1
Liked 7 Times in 5 Posts
|
![]()
flat top pistons without valve pockets.
RB |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: NS CANADA
Posts: 892
Likes: 1,646
Liked 393 Times in 153 Posts
|
![]()
79-81 good hp numbers
82 bigger carb/better (aluminum) intake and bigger cam 83-84 poor heads and no roller cam (but same hp as 85) 85 has roller cam and more lift than 83-84 86 sucks for one year only pistons and speed density FI 87-93 Mass air FI with good potential |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Belmont ohio
Posts: 20
Likes: 47
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]()
89 was first year for mass air flow 87-88 speed density
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 567
Likes: 4,185
Liked 776 Times in 199 Posts
|
![]()
86 heads are not good, 87-93 have the better heads.
Bret Velde SS/LA |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: New Brunswick, Canada
Posts: 69
Likes: 1
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]()
Thanks for the responses everyone.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Schomberg, ON, Canada
Posts: 1,222
Likes: 1,606
Liked 364 Times in 138 Posts
|
![]()
Tony Denysenko runs that combo in a Capri...Div 5 car.
![]()
__________________
Dave Turner SS/GT #1153 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Duluth, Mn.
Posts: 155
Likes: 2,798
Liked 24 Times in 8 Posts
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|