|
|
![]() |
#1 | |
VIP Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Bardstown, KY
Posts: 1,937
Likes: 131
Liked 369 Times in 127 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
I cannot seeing one single NHRA racer not liking the idea of getting an extra 3 tenths advantage during qualifying. However, keeping the carbed cars separate from the EFI cars may not work because NHRA has equivalent classes for the EFI cars. Either way, I would enter my EFI T-Bird as an IHRA car because the factored hp is less in IHRA for the same combo, therefore less weight I have to tug around. ![]()
__________________
Alan Mackin Stock 3777/ SS 3377 P/SA & SS/PA Fox Thunderbird I/PS '95 Mustang GT |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 129
Likes: 5
Liked 27 Times in 14 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
On a separate note, I'm not sure I understand how "weight" will not be a technical requirement. Maybe someone can clarify! In terms of the heads up, I think it could work. Basically, as long as you run your car within 0.10 of "wide open" at all times, you should be able to cover your "heads up dial-in". Bottom line, with this scenario, the faster car will most likely still win. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
Member
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 253
Likes: 286
Liked 84 Times in 42 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
We run both IHRA and NHRA but do not have the advantage of the .3 easier index in IHRA because we have one of the dreaded new cars, even though ours is pretty much a stock combo. In fact, it is backwards NHRA FS/H - 11.50, IHRA DD/FIA - 11.30 We do get to take 165 lbs. out in IHRA but we can't get it out anyway so we don't bother. In the end qualifying, unless you are #1, doesn't mean a whole lot.
__________________
Bob Tilton 568 FS/H |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|