HOME FORUM RULES CONTACT
     
   
   

Go Back   CLASS RACER FORUM > Class Racer Forums > Stock and Super Stock

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-12-2013, 09:10 AM   #31
Billy Nees
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: On a hilltop in Pa.
Posts: 4,487
Likes: 3,588
Liked 7,688 Times in 1,732 Posts
Default Re: Christmas continues for MOPAR rsacers

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sam Capizzi Jr View Post
The 318 2bbl motor has two major issues... Intake/carburetor and Valve clearance. Right now I'm using a 240 duration cam at .050 and I have .025 clearance on the intake and .040 on the exhaust. If they would allow a 4 eyebrow 318 replacement piston, the combo would be good at 185 hp and would pull high rpm with more cam... Btw the 69 motor has .031 less clearance.
Well Sam, if you can stand another FWIW(don't ya just hate us keyboard racers?). I don't know how bad your intake is but I do know that some of the early 70s 318s had a single plane intake that doesn't look bad and the carb is bigger than the carb I'm allowed to use on my 307. Have you ever had the heads on a flowbench? What kind of cranking pressure (cylinder pressure) do you have? I'm asking because I think that your cam is a little too big. Shorten up that duration (and tighten lobesep?) and you've got valve clearence. What have you got for header dia? length?
__________________
Billy Nees 1188 STK, SS

I'm not spending 100K to win 2K
Billy Nees is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-12-2013, 10:48 AM   #32
Sam Capizzi Jr
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Rochester NY
Posts: 131
Likes: 25
Liked 43 Times in 9 Posts
Default Re: Christmas continues for MOPAR rsacers

Quote:
Originally Posted by Billy Nees View Post
Well Sam, if you can stand another FWIW(don't ya just hate us keyboard racers?). I don't know how bad your intake is but I do know that some of the early 70s 318s had a single plane intake that doesn't look bad and the carb is bigger than the carb I'm allowed to use on my 307. Have you ever had the heads on a flowbench? What kind of cranking pressure (cylinder pressure) do you have? I'm asking because I think that your cam is a little too big. Shorten up that duration (and tighten lobesep?) and you've got valve clearence. What have you got for header dia? length?
Lets see...
There are two intakes listed. (3698431 and 3698437) Ill have to try and find the one ending in 7.

Heads. No flow bench

180psi cranking pressure

Headers are 1.50 dia with 3' out. Not sure of length but has 12' collector
__________________
Sam Capizzi Jr. 1301
SS/AS 93 Dodge Daytona
R/SA 73 Dodge Dart

Last edited by Sam Capizzi Jr; 04-06-2014 at 09:03 PM.
Sam Capizzi Jr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-12-2013, 12:48 PM   #33
Billy Nees
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: On a hilltop in Pa.
Posts: 4,487
Likes: 3,588
Liked 7,688 Times in 1,732 Posts
Default Re: Christmas continues for MOPAR rsacers

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sam Capizzi Jr View Post
Lets see...
There are two intakes listed. (3698431 and 3698437) Ill have to try and find the one ending in 7.

Heads. No flow bench

180psi cranking pressure

Cam is .240/.246 109 advanced 4

Headers are 1.50 dia with 3' out. Not sure of length but has 12' collector
Well FWIW, I'd like to see what the other intake looks like.
180 psi is OK but I'd like to see it around 200.
I'd love to see that things reaction to about a .236/.240 on a 108(or even a 106) and with a lowgear TF it shouldn't need the cam advanced.
1.50 headers are right but I'd like to see it's reaction to a 2.5" collector.
__________________
Billy Nees 1188 STK, SS

I'm not spending 100K to win 2K
Billy Nees is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-12-2013, 01:09 PM   #34
Sam Capizzi Jr
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Rochester NY
Posts: 131
Likes: 25
Liked 43 Times in 9 Posts
Default Re: Christmas continues for MOPAR rsacers

Quote:
Originally Posted by Billy Nees View Post
Well FWIW, I'd like to see what the other intake looks like.
180 psi is OK but I'd like to see it around 200.
I'd love to see that things reaction to about a .236/.240 on a 108(or even a 106) and with a lowgear TF it shouldn't need the cam advanced.
1.50 headers are right but I'd like to see it's reaction to a 2.5" collector.
Very useful information. This is the first cam I've tried but I'm working on second one. The only reason I went with the 109 was to gain some clearance. I had the 2.5 collector on the car and it was a tenth slower then the 3. No low gear in 904. Yet. Next time it's out. Also use 4.56 with 28 tire
__________________
Sam Capizzi Jr. 1301
SS/AS 93 Dodge Daytona
R/SA 73 Dodge Dart

Last edited by Sam Capizzi Jr; 01-12-2013 at 01:10 PM. Reason: Added info
Sam Capizzi Jr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-17-2013, 06:25 AM   #35
GTX JOHN
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Boulder City, Nevada 89005
Posts: 2,732
Likes: 2,797
Liked 2,479 Times in 697 Posts
Default Re: Christmas continues for MOPAR rsacers

Sam: You Really need a 275 low gear! They came in some of the
later 70s- 80s cars. When I put a spare trans in my 340 low comp.
stocker it went from 1.45 60s to 1.58 and would not fall out of a tree!
The difference should be pretty dramatic on your Duster.
I used to get them from a Transmission parts core shop in Vegas .

Bob Mazzolini Racing used to sell them by themselves years ago.
If you can not find one..........let me know and I will start looking for one
they are not expensive and probably a lot of Mopar Guys have some
laying around.

The next thing I would try to find is a Aluminum front Drum as they make
a good improvement for the money.

PM me if I can Help!

Last edited by GTX JOHN; 01-17-2013 at 06:30 AM.
GTX JOHN is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:34 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.