Foxbody Stocker/Bracket Racer

[SwillRacer]

Originally Posted by Jeff Swanson

The engine specs are the same as any '88 225/215hp 5.0 HO found in the GTs and LXs. You can find car itself in the Stock Car Classification Guide under 1988 Ford. It's the last Mustang listed.

What are you looking for specifically?

Ya know what, it was a rookie mistake on my part. I was looking at the classification for 1989 which is my cars model year and there is no Saleen specs. Why do the Saleen's get to weigh so much less? I'm guessing its because of the Saleen's lighter weight suspension parts = lighter shipping weight?

[SwillRacer]

Well, here's what I've been up to tonight while most of you are watch bowl games and drinking beer. LOL!

First, I pulled the T-5. (Sorry about the size and orientation of this pic. I rotated it in photobucket and when I view it in there it looks right, but not here for some reason - Yes I did save my changes in photobucket!)


Then I went after the short block.


I still have the car up on jack stands so I was questioning whether I'd be able to get the engine up high enough to clear the fenders and core. Turns out I had about 6 inches to spare!! Yeeeeehaaaaa!!


And here is where I stopped for the night. My master bedroom is right over the garage so I didn't want the compressor to be kicking on/off too late and wake up the wife. This is what 120K miles and a few years of sitting around looks like. Before I do anything else I'm going to have to head over to Harbor Freight and pick up a parts washer.

[SwillRacer]

what do you guys recommend for getting rust off the exterior surfaces of the block? Sand blast? Angle die grinder with some of those fiber surface cleaner discs?

In my experience I've been fortunate to only have worked on new racing blocks so they were always nice and clean before we painted them. I've never really had to contend with all this rust and sludge. I guess I'm spoiled.

[Jeff Swanson]

Originally Posted by SwillRacer

Why do the Saleen's get to weigh so much less? I'm guessing its because of the Saleen's lighter weight suspension parts = lighter shipping weight?

I can't see any reason why a Saleen would be any lighter than a Mustang GT. Back in the day I think someone had Ford submit a "creative" shipping weight for the Saleen so that it would fit the faster SS/GT classes with a Cleveland.

[Damn Yankee]

Originally Posted by Jeff Swanson

I can't see any reason why a Saleen would be any lighter than a Mustang GT. Back in the day I think someone had Ford submit a "creative" shipping weight for the Saleen so that it would fit the faster SS/GT classes with a Cleveland.

I know where there is a 428 FE GT/B Saleen Mustang that is really light...........pretty sure he has dipped in the 8's as well

[Jeff Swanson]

Originally Posted by Damn Yankee

I know where there is a 428 FE GT/B Saleen Mustang that is really light...........pretty sure he has dipped in the 8's as well

About 5 miles from my house. The LeBlanc Saleen is a bad hombre. 8.9x in GT/A.

[Evan Smith]

I may have heads, intake and other parts for sale.

Evan

[Mark Yacavone]

You probably already know this ,but other readers may not.
The rear trailing arms are bolted into sheet metal brackets on these cars.
Significant beefing up and bracing is needed in those areas.

[David Lee]

Originally Posted by Mark Yacavone

You probably already know this ,but other readers may not.
The rear trailing arms are bolted into sheet metal brackets on these cars.
Significant beefing up and bracing is needed in those areas.

Are you talking about the torque boxes?