|
|
|
|
10-09-2012, 01:20 AM
|
#1 |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Sandusky, OH
Posts: 58
Likes: 2
Liked 25 Times in 1 Post
|
Re: Issues with the tech dept
Unfortunately you are correct and this will be the true slow death of s/ss. All other complaints are mute if there is nobody to correctly classify a car. It's an old GJ song. "Who's Gonna Fill Their Shoe's". No class tech's no class and that's a fact.
|
|
|
|
10-09-2012, 07:45 AM
|
#2 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 663
Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times in 7 Posts
|
Re: Issues with the tech dept
Maybe it's something like...."better enjoy it while you can"....that being...the current state of class racing....
|
|
|
|
|
10-09-2012, 09:37 AM
|
#3 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Bossier City,La.
Posts: 659
Likes: 3
Liked 104 Times in 35 Posts
|
Re: Issues with the tech dept
After Ohio BS the Firebird/Camaro should had been with a P/W factor of 8.20. NHRA needs to relook at the PW and make a adjustment. Put the cars in the RIGHT P/W factor.
Never should have came out 7.99. Just saying
__________________
Bobby Brannon 4705 STK, SS |
|
|
|
|
10-09-2012, 10:00 AM
|
#4 |
|
VIP Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: LONG ISLAND N.Y.
Posts: 1,681
Likes: 3,388
Liked 1,828 Times in 427 Posts
|
Re: Issues with the tech dept
Its not techs fault..They were teching cars in your pit area. becuace of the rain....Like Wayne said his mistake ..But he had the right LBs in car ..i assume he had a lb sticker DEAD ISSUE.
__________________
james perrone 1290 STK |
|
|
|
 |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
