|
|
![]() |
#1 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,041
Likes: 1,071
Liked 481 Times in 158 Posts
|
![]()
Buybacks suck and now we have a local track going one step further selling buy back insurance !!! Might as well leave the cars on the trailer and give the win to the guy who has the fattest wallet.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]()
Re-entry is different from a buyback in that you still have to win to move on to round two.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Tulsa, Oklahoma
Posts: 1,669
Likes: 3,855
Liked 800 Times in 337 Posts
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
VIP Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Elgin,IL
Posts: 1,339
Likes: 5
Liked 282 Times in 103 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
This is a better system than automatically buying back into the second round without ever winning a round like some tracks have done it. I understand why this is done to help with the purse,but my math shows that 22 cars paid to re-enter the race.That is $2200 toward the purse.IF 11 cars did not show up at the race at all because they don't like the concept of "re entry",then $2200+ was lost in potential revenue. Last edited by 442OLDS; 10-16-2011 at 09:46 AM. Reason: Math |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Aylmer Quebec, Canada
Posts: 1,086
Likes: 31
Liked 69 Times in 30 Posts
|
![]()
Tim, what is buy back insurance? Buy backs would work if used properly, all first round loser wanting to get back in the program would have to run each other and then the winner could be inserted into the next round, this way, they would be deserving of continuing in the program. Claude R.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,041
Likes: 1,071
Liked 481 Times in 158 Posts
|
![]()
Claude,you will find the buy back info on Arnie's site back approx 1 month ago ...$$$$
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Tacoma,WA
Posts: 341
Likes: 2
Liked 43 Times in 9 Posts
|
![]()
The way I see it...IHRA is trying to do something really great for us racers, guaranteeing $5000 to win plus contingency for $200 to enter. If they have to have $100 buybacks to help augment the purse, so be it. Compare that to $1800 to win in NHRA for $305....
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: NOO JOISEY nexta NOO YAWK
Posts: 5,879
Likes: 38
Liked 100 Times in 45 Posts
|
![]()
Buybacks are the equilivent of having a nanny gov't to take care of your needs.
We need more buybacks.Too bad they don't have them in ther sports.Then: 1)My Islanders could have the game back they lost to Edmonton in 1985.Then they could have won a fifth championship in a row. 2)Bill Buckner's miscue in the 1986 World Series. 3)Give back Bobby Thompson's home run against the Dodgers. 4)My ***** light last year at MG national event in the semis. 5)I bet the Germans would like buybacks for the wars they screwed up.Let's not even mention the French.
__________________
Former NHRA #1945 Former IHRA #1945 T/SA Last edited by Ed Fernandez; 10-15-2011 at 06:34 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Whittier, Ca
Posts: 830
Likes: 94
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
|
![]()
Mark I agree with you, I like the idea. The sad part is we do not have that option.
__________________
Tony Janes 7941 STK, SS |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 | |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 152
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
__________________
Tod Lane Swartz & Lane 66 Nova Swartz & Lane 79 H/CM Trans Am |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|