|
|
![]() |
#1 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 924
Likes: 103
Liked 101 Times in 52 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
If we read this correctly they expect a car with more modifications and 170 lbs less wt to run just .18 quicker? |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Where the Green Grass Grows, AL
Posts: 2,375
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
|
![]()
Well it did it with no modifications from how he ran it in stock.
__________________
Chad Rhodes 2113 I/SA |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 924
Likes: 103
Liked 101 Times in 52 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
Thanks |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 707
Likes: 30
Liked 239 Times in 94 Posts
|
![]()
6.0lb Stockers ... like a 427 Cobra? Unfortunately that wouldn't run with the CJ's and Drag Paks either but it'll be interesting to see how deep in the 8's a Stocker will go.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 567
Likes: 4,178
Liked 776 Times in 199 Posts
|
![]()
8's and "stockers" aren't supposed to be in the same sentence. Totally wrong!!
Bret Velde |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|