|
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 248
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Conway, AR
Posts: 1,739
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times in 4 Posts
|
![]()
Thanks, Clay. I'm not too swift when it comes to the letters/numbers game that involves foreign cars.
I just look at a '65 Mustang, and a '65 Barracuda and wonder what justifies the addition of at LEAST 800 pounds of weight to those cars in the 2009-2010 versions, Camaro included. Those cars had a few aluminum parts (automatic transmissions, mainly), but everything else was cast iron and steel and the both came in at very close to 3,000 pounds, curb weight. Think about it.... EIGHT HUNDRED POUNDS (and in some cases, more.) And, the cars are basically the same size... or, should be if they're not. I don't remember anybody not buying a new Mustang because it was too small. Weight is a very important element in the performance makeup of any car; particularly, these. Can you IMAGINE how an SRT-8 Hemi would motivate a 3,000-pound '65 Barracuda??? Instant low- 12's (maybe better) on the street. What a shame...
__________________
Bill Last edited by bill dedman; 05-01-2009 at 10:55 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Belle Vernon, PA
Posts: 288
Likes: 26
Liked 55 Times in 19 Posts
|
![]()
.......Who's ugly now?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: N.S. CANADA
Posts: 498
Likes: 160
Liked 68 Times in 41 Posts
|
![]()
motor trend or chevy trend. Maybe they should of used the 425hp srt and not 376hp rt.one with more power and better brakes.will it is chevy trend.
__________________
1231 FS/D Drag Pak 1231 E/SA 71 Demon Kelly MacKay |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: pataskala ohio
Posts: 132
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]()
motor trend hates all usa built cars ,have you ever read it ? this was a performance car price COMPARABLE between cars in the same price range.im sure the zr1 vette and viper are faster then all the ones tested ,but at tree times the price.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: N.S. CANADA
Posts: 498
Likes: 160
Liked 68 Times in 41 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
2010 6.2 (422hp)V-8-powered Camaro SS can be yours for around $35K. 2010 Ford Mustang GT Coupe (4.6L V8 315HP) $27,995 2009 Dodge Challenger SRT8 (6.1L V8 425HP) $40,220 all off the motor trend wed page so they can give $5000 more to the chevy, so why not the dodge or the ford?
__________________
1231 FS/D Drag Pak 1231 E/SA 71 Demon Kelly MacKay |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: pataskala ohio
Posts: 132
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]()
road and track, june 2009,they do compare it to a challenger sr8t at 40k and it was closer but still lost out.you can find this on roadandtrack.com.but the stang was the best handling one of the three at 3590# the camaro ss at 3860# and challenger at4145#.i still dont get all the hate ,they are all better then muscle cars we had growing up.camaro and srt8 ran same 1/4 time with the camaro a tenth faster from 0 to 60.all 3 cool cars but none of them blow the other 2 away...
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|