|
![]() |
#11 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 294
Likes: 102
Liked 24 Times in 13 Posts
|
![]()
Looks to me some racers are making a case for taking the rules backwards and others are for moving forward toward overall engine safety. The point we can all agree on is everybody understands and accepts the problem but have differing viewpoints on how to correct them.
Maybe it's just me but my belief is once you start down a path you must be prepared to reach the end as long as the overall spirit of the rules are never compromised. Opening the duration rule, no limit on valve spring pressures, roller rockers, wild valve jobs, aftermarket oil pans, etc have been good things, and in my opinion, have keep Stock Eliminator from getting rather boring. Does anyone really want to see and A/S car slow down a half second or more? Another issue is Tear Down. Does anyone really believe the tech department wants to increase the time it takes to check camshaft duration, valve spring pressures, etc? I would doubt that very seriously. For what it's worth my 2 cents is the path forward is a far cheaper fix for the current camshaft/lifter mess and therefore rates superior to turning around and heading backwards with the rules. Retreating with the rules would be far more expensive not to mention it would be a waste of valuable time for us- as well as the tech officials.
__________________
Mike Keener A/S B/S C/SM |
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
|
|