HOME FORUM RULES CONTACT
     
   
   

Go Back   CLASS RACER FORUM > Class Racer Forums > Stock and Super Stock
Register Photo Gallery FAQ Community Calendar

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-10-2010, 02:41 PM   #1
Jim Kaekel
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Michigan
Posts: 1,227
Likes: 133
Liked 530 Times in 108 Posts
Default Superb Article On Current State of Stock Eliminator

Applause to Jok Nicholson. Exceptional article with well made points.

http://www.dragracingonline.com/colu...n/xii_9-1.html
__________________
Jim Kaekel 3836 STK
Jim Kaekel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-10-2010, 03:01 PM   #2
art leong
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Richmond Hill, Georgia
Posts: 2,003
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default Re: Superb Article On Current State of Stock Eliminator

He should have fact checked himself. He is off on a few counts.
Sounds like he is biased.

A couple of facts Nobody has touched on yet.
There were 3 Drag Pack cars that didn't qualify.
Every stocker and superstocker there went under the index in qualifying all 338 of them.
__________________
__________________
Art Leong 2095 SS

Last edited by art leong; 09-10-2010 at 03:19 PM.
art leong is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-10-2010, 03:04 PM   #3
Eric Kitzan
Junior Member
 
Eric Kitzan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Glen ullin ND
Posts: 62
Likes: 3
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: Superb Article On Current State of Stock Eliminator

What is he wrong about?
__________________
Eric Kitzan
66 Chevelle Malibu Wagon
Stocker
Eric Kitzan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-10-2010, 03:15 PM   #4
Clay Arnett
Member
 
Clay Arnett's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Hartsville, IN
Posts: 128
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: Superb Article On Current State of Stock Eliminator

He was wrong about everyone being shocked with how fast the cars ran. They got plenty more left.
Clay Arnett is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-10-2010, 03:26 PM   #5
art leong
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Richmond Hill, Georgia
Posts: 2,003
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default Re: Superb Article On Current State of Stock Eliminator

There were more Camaros than (41) than DP's and CJ's combined.
Almost one out of 4 cars was a Camaro
__________________
Art Leong 2095 SS
art leong is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-10-2010, 07:22 PM   #6
novassdude
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: usa
Posts: 752
Likes: 204
Liked 136 Times in 49 Posts
Default Re: Superb Article On Current State of Stock Eliminator

Quote:
Originally Posted by art leong View Post
There were more Camaros than (41) than DP's and CJ's combined.
Almost one out of 4 cars was a Camaro
Considering that they built Camaros for 35 years and the DP and Mustang for two there should be alot more of them. What percetage of the Camaros were available to every one right off the showroom as production cars100% how many of the Dp or mustangs where off the showroom floor as production cars? Maybe 1 I believe that Mr Dual (sorry if I got the name wrong) built his from a real car but runs the bugus crate motor in it. Not that that is his fault they wont let the real cars in.
novassdude is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-10-2010, 07:59 PM   #7
Tim H
VIP Member
 
Tim H's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,041
Likes: 1,068
Liked 481 Times in 158 Posts
Default Re: Superb Article On Current State of Stock Eliminator

Quote:
Originally Posted by art leong View Post
There were more Camaros than (41) than DP's and CJ's combined.
Almost one out of 4 cars was a Camaro
Thats what makes stock such a great class !!
Tim H is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-10-2010, 03:28 PM   #8
James Perrone
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: LONG ISLAND N.Y.
Posts: 1,672
Likes: 3,359
Liked 1,804 Times in 422 Posts
Default Re: Superb Article On Current State of Stock Eliminator

Hes 90 % right
All I know is when I pulled in the water box and saw the dail in first round in a E/SA Mustang was 10.22..
THATS JUST WRONG !!
A a thru C/SA would be proud of that number.
By the way ART the 3 cars you speak about all BROKE.
So with the 20 new cars NHRA shortened the field by 20+ %
__________________
james perrone 1290 STK
James Perrone is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-10-2010, 03:32 PM   #9
art leong
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Richmond Hill, Georgia
Posts: 2,003
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default Re: Superb Article On Current State of Stock Eliminator

Quote:
Originally Posted by James Perrone View Post
Hes 90 % right
All I know is when I pulled in the water box and saw the dail in first round in a E/SA Mustang was 10.22..
THATS JUST WRONG !!
A a thru C/SA would be proud of that number.
By the way ART the 3 cars you speak about all BROKE.
So with the 20 new cars NHRA shortened the field by 20+ %
Someone writing an article should not be 90% right.
__________________
Art Leong 2095 SS
art leong is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-10-2010, 07:24 PM   #10
Toby Lang
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Auburn, WA
Posts: 2,133
Likes: 2
Liked 2 Times in 1 Post
Default Re: Superb Article On Current State of Stock Eliminator

Quote:
Originally Posted by art leong View Post
He should have fact checked himself. He is off on a few counts.
Sounds like he is biased.

A couple of facts Nobody has touched on yet.
There were 3 Drag Pack cars that didn't qualify.
Every stocker and superstocker there went under the index in qualifying all 338 of them.
__________________

So he should have used the word "qualified" when referring to the new cars being at least 8 tenths under.

You said he is off on a few counts. What are the others?


-Toby
Toby Lang is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:51 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.