Quote:
Originally Posted by Jeff Teuton
OK Boys. Here is the deal. I own all three cars in question. And it was way too early in the morning to race. But Really, my team will do what it takes. This far into the season you do what you gotta do. And the fun has just started. I will have to invoke the Chuckey Rayburn rule; if you ain't in the top ten, you don't have a vote. Wait till Las Vegas and then we can get this thing souped up. From the tower; the hood was way above the scoreboards. I need a picture. Brannon, you could not hit a hood with a blunderbuss, so I know you can't hit a duck. I love it when a plan comes together. The other Chuck Rayburn rule goes like this here; If you don't have a car or haven't raced in two years or more; you don't have a vote. Now Chuck Rayburn rules are totally Politically Incorrect by today's standards. But Chuck is Politically Incorrect for any standard. He is in charge, so whatever he says in Vegas in law.
|
Jeff,
I accept your generous offer of law maker for the Las Vegas race. The first law is for you. You and Sherman will trade cars and we will see which car can run the fastest and quickest all out for class. No "gentleman's agreement" allowed. Based on both of your 1000' ets in the "mineshaft conditions" at Indy, you both are 200 lbs. too light for B/SA. In the interest of "fairness" for your fellow B/SA racers, you both shouldn't have a problem deliberately giving yourselves the weight you both deserve.
Its either this or both of you have to wear a bumper sticker that says, "I'm not fast, I'm in the wrong class!" Its all about "fairness" and not discouraging your fellow B/SA racers. I know you are a "fair" man...don't let me down.