View Single Post
Old 03-05-2009, 07:14 PM   #5
GarysZ24
VIP Member
 
GarysZ24's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Tempe, Az.
Posts: 1,270
Likes: 918
Liked 238 Times in 94 Posts
Send a message via MSN to GarysZ24 Send a message via Yahoo to GarysZ24
Default Re: "WHAT IF" part 4

[QUOTE=X-TECH MAN;108474]
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jack McCarthy View Post
what rules do we go to in case of mulitple rules ?
like pistons, slick size etc ?

thats the only big issue i see

Hummmm, you guys tell me what you want. I personally always thought the NHRA piston rule was BS. I like IHRA' s or the way the old stockers from the late '60's and early 70's had thier piston rule. It wasnt any more expensive to buy these pistons and a hell of lot eaiser to police. Id say use 9"inch tires on the stockers but 10 inch tires last longer but are slower and dont fit some wheel wells as easily. As far as Im concerened its open for discussion. Maybe Alex will say different?? Its going to be YOUR association. I guess this is a good time to state your likes and dislikes about both NHRA and IHRA rules. At first the rules should be close to both associations but the lack of inspections in IHRA and the lack of interest from NHRA is something that needs to be dealt with.
Hey Jack and/or Terry,

How would you handle "THE FEW, THE PROUD, THE FRONT WHEEL DRIVE STOCKER RACERS"? I must ask, because while NHRA only has five classes for us, IHRA has 16...which NHRA hasn't had for at least 4yrs??? If you wanted to keep class sizes down, I'd have no problem running in the F/I class, because the IHRA's "L/FIA class could be do-able too??? Just a thought....
__________________
Gary Hampton
'86 Z24,173 V6
CF/S #5824 (#78 in 2021)

Last edited by GarysZ24; 03-05-2009 at 07:16 PM.
GarysZ24 is offline   Reply With Quote