CLASS RACER FORUM

CLASS RACER FORUM (https://classracer.com/classforum/index.php)
-   Stock and Super Stock (https://classracer.com/classforum/forumdisplay.php?f=3)
-   -   HP off / HP on ?? (https://classracer.com/classforum/showthread.php?t=62380)

Jack McCarthy 05-31-2016 03:53 PM

HP off / HP on ??
 
been thinking (dangerous) ....

how is it possible that one request for HP off was written and it was levied against (for) and ENTIRE motor family not just the individual combination...

therefore would it be unreasonable to expect as those FAMILY were levied HP penalties it would count towards the ENTIRE FAMILY that now is statistically a group per NHRA as a indicated by the aforementioned group reduction ?????

anyway can only get them hit as fast as i can .... got one at the SPORTS :)

captain jack

and thanks to Jimmy Harrison / Thomas Arnett / Deano for the #2 qualifer spot !!!!

Lyn Smith 05-31-2016 06:38 PM

Re: HP off / HP on ??
 
I thought someone said it qualified for mineshaft conditions due to the 64 th car being .85 under?

Larry Hill 05-31-2016 07:49 PM

Re: HP off / HP on ??
 
-1.20 under still applies

Jack McCarthy 05-31-2016 11:18 PM

Re: HP off / HP on ??
 
That's three weeks in a row a ffflying ffford got hit on Tuesday ... well I assume Wednesday its a holiday week

Captain

Bob Shaw 06-01-2016 09:36 AM

Re: HP off / HP on ??
 
Jack,
Congratulations for qualifying #2. That's a tough class you are in.

Jim Cimarolli 06-01-2016 06:59 PM

Re: HP off / HP on ??
 
Jack, that run, 13.70, was really impressive!

Billy Nees 06-02-2016 09:05 AM

Re: HP off / HP on ??
 
Cheez Jack, the poor baxtids that are running that 75/302 combo are at 140 HP now! That's the same rating as my 230 inch straight six with a monojet!

Tom Moock 06-02-2016 12:45 PM

Re: HP off / HP on ??
 
Billy, 1975 Maverick fact. 122hp now 164hp. 1975 Mustang fact. 129hp. now 140hp. same motor. Maverick must be a slicker body? Kind like 2000 corvette Ls1 345hp and 382hp, 2000 Camaro & Firebird.Tom

Mike Graham 06-02-2016 01:27 PM

Re: HP off / HP on ??
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Tom Moock (Post 505232)
Billy, 1975 Maverick fact. 122hp now 164hp. 1975 Mustang fact. 129hp. now 140hp. same motor. Maverick must be a slicker body? Kind like 2000 corvette Ls1 345hp and 382hp, 2000 Camaro & Firebird.Tom

Tom, It is a little more complicated than that. The longer wheelbase and more rear overhang of the Maverick allow it to pitch rotate better than the Mustang. This allows the Maverick to plant the tires better all the way down the track. Keeping in mind that we are only allowed 9 inch tires this is an important advantage. The addition of wheelie bars on the Maverick controls some of this rotation.
As a side note.. The Mustang(like the Chevy wagon) has MUCH better brakes.
I hope this clears up some of the confusion.

Dwight Southerland 06-02-2016 02:57 PM

Re: HP off / HP on ??
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Tom Moock (Post 505232)
Billy, 1975 Maverick fact. 122hp now 164hp. 1975 Mustang fact. 129hp. now 140hp. same motor. Maverick must be a slicker body? Kind like 2000 corvette Ls1 345hp and 382hp, 2000 Camaro & Firebird.Tom

You just don't understand the whole situation. When you put engines in a Mustang, it becomes a whole different engine and must be considered separately. The '75 302/129hp engine in a Monarch or a Granada is 164, but 140 in a Mustang. The '76 302/133hp engine in a Monarch, Granada, Maverick or Comet is 138, but in a Mustang it's 133. See?!?


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:37 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.