New HP Numbers Posted
 

On nhraracer.com. Good luck.

Re: New HP Numbers Posted
 

So no matter what model car they all get HP ?

Re: New HP Numbers Posted
 

You will have to look at the Classification sheets to see where the changes are actually applied. The announcements documents can be confusing.

Re: New HP Numbers Posted
 

How did the small cam 305 85-86 Get 4HP, and the big cam combo stay the same?
I missed some fast runs ??

Re: New HP Numbers Posted
 

Wish NHRA would publish the data base averages like they used to so that decisions can be better understood.

Re: New HP Numbers Posted
 

Wow !! The WELFARE line in stock eliminator sure got smaller . Can’t believe the regular suspects didn’t get their FREE cheese …::):)

Re: New HP Numbers Posted
 

Ford 428 HP 383 to 388. I have a set of Aluminum Replacement heads New, Untouched
for sale.

Re: New HP Numbers Posted
 

OH NO!! '79 302 got hit, but I don't even have it built yet!! Oh wait...it's the fairmont manual....never mind, life is good again. LOL!!!

Re: New HP Numbers Posted
 

I saw the 428 on the list but mine was already at 388 and I’m not finished yet either! Lol

Re: New HP Numbers Posted
 

What I don't understand is that an engine family like the 302, 1967 to 1969 are all the same HP, yet just the 1969 350/300 got HP, why not all the other years?

Casey Miles
248H Stock

Re: New HP Numbers Posted
 

Different casting number intake manifold. 67 & 68 same castings, 69 different .

Re: New HP Numbers Posted
 

Same as the 302 with casting numbers, they are different, but I don't think I can use a '67's. It's still all in the family.

Casey Miles
248H Stock

Re: New HP Numbers Posted
 

Is the crank pin smaller on the 67 302, so does that make three different engines

Re: New HP Numbers Posted
 

# 610 intake can be used all 3 years.

Re: New HP Numbers Posted
 

67 302 is a small journal and 68/9 are large journals, so they are different but considered same engine family with same hp.
I guess the 67/8 are considered 295 HP.

Re: New HP Numbers Posted
 

81 camaro 305 / 155 hp got 11 hp.

Re: New HP Numbers Posted
 

Glenn,
You are a fountain of Chevrolet Spec. knowledge. WOW! I love it.
Frank

Re: New HP Numbers Posted
 

Frank how about a dripping spigot..........and no knowledge just looking up facts. lol

Re: New HP Numbers Posted
 

My 350/300 got another 7 HP.
Thank you NHRA for the Christmas gift.

Re: New HP Numbers Posted
 

Thank the person who did it, not who set the rules to race by.

Re: New HP Numbers Posted
 

Since there is no tech, which is an NHRA issue, most of the rules are irrelevant.

Re: New HP Numbers Posted
 

If a 54 year old combination is getting hp we don’t have a hp problem we have an index problem across the board . There have been a lot of advancements in stock and ss since the last index adjustments. We cant just simply keep adding weight to combo’s.

Re: New HP Numbers Posted
 

I just got dizzy looking at the latest ford 428 hp updates. Tom

Re: New HP Numbers Posted
 

Some cars didn't get advancements in stock that the Chevy's did. My car already had a solid cam, adjustable shaft rockers, a thick rigid block, good valves, double springs, a good mani, more than enough carb CFM, a good front and rear suspension and good rods and crank. Most older cars shouldn't have to add weight, moving up a class is a good option as very few older cars would need to be higher than the AA/SA class.