|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Perry, GA
Posts: 331
Likes: 11
Liked 239 Times in 90 Posts
|
![]()
Talked with Dart today. The 305 little M block is no longer in existence. Discontinued. They are replacing it with a 305 SHP block but it will be at least 6 months before one is produced. Oh, and the part number changed and the new number is NOT on the approved list.
Little M 305 31151411 New SHP 305 31161411 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: CT
Posts: 454
Likes: 1,776
Liked 345 Times in 149 Posts
|
![]()
And from what I've been told the SHP blocks are now being cast in China
![]()
__________________
Phil Molski PMR Performance S/C 1623 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Live Reporter
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Hickory, Ky
Posts: 10,614
Likes: 1,901
Liked 10,655 Times in 2,211 Posts
|
![]()
Would a sleeved 400 block work, it would have thick cylinder walls.
|
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#4 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: Kalamazoo, MI
Posts: 19
Likes: 63
Liked 22 Times in 6 Posts
|
![]()
I purchased a 305 Little M block in early 2020 but it was stolen out of my engine builders shop, and then Dart discontinued them. Now it appears they are making a new 305 block with a different part number.
I'm kinda new to all this, what is the procedure to get the new P/N approved? Can I initiate it or does Dart have to? Thanks.
__________________
Tom Johnston 3177 84 Cutlass 305 L/SA M/SA |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
VIP Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Glendale, Arizona
Posts: 3,036
Likes: 710
Liked 1,538 Times in 575 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#6 |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: CT
Posts: 454
Likes: 1,776
Liked 345 Times in 149 Posts
|
![]()
The mains are a different size - I don't know if spacer bearings would be legal?
__________________
Phil Molski PMR Performance S/C 1623 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2020
Posts: 269
Likes: 3,723
Liked 520 Times in 176 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
I haven't done this myself - yet, but wouldn't a good 4" 350 block be a reasonable choice? Main bores are right size and the cylinder walls (once sleeved ) would be pretty thick as well without the cooling problems like cracking from the steam holes between the cylinder bores. Just my 2 cents from my little corner of the world! Respectfully, Henry Kunz 1534 H/SA |
|
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#8 | |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Pierre, SD
Posts: 204
Likes: 0
Liked 49 Times in 15 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
Sleeved blocks work very well if done properly. I have a 350 block that is sleeved and a 307 block that is sleeved. Personally, I think the 307 block is better as it was an early casting block and had very thick cylinder walls to start with. I know that people say it costs too much or it's too much work to sleeve a block. But when you factor the cost of an aftermarket block and all the required machine work to true up every surface of a new block, I don't think those claims are valid. But I'm old and my stuff is slow, what do I know
__________________
Dean Feiock -- Stock 5002 Last edited by Dean Feiock; 07-15-2022 at 05:51 PM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#10 | |
Junior Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: kansas city
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Liked 17 Times in 6 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
https://www.competitionproducts.com/.../#.Yt3EtXbMKM8 Last edited by tscheerer; 07-24-2022 at 06:23 PM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|