|
![]() |
#1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 778
Likes: 916
Liked 1,434 Times in 304 Posts
|
![]()
Hoosier 9 x 30-94 inch rollout-C06 vs. M/T 9 x 30/9 x 29.5-All are Radials
Want real world experiences Hook- Cold-Average-Hot-Tracks Runs per set-Medium Burnout ET difference/MPH Differences Do not need Goodyear or Phoenix comparisons. Thanks, J.R. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: Indianola Washington
Posts: 397
Likes: 0
Liked 453 Times in 146 Posts
|
![]()
I have done back to back testing, using those same tires at the same pressures. Burn out was just hazing them.
The Mickey's were 2hun in the 60 and 6hun total, quicker. I run the Hooisers 95% of the time as they will go 150+ runs if you take care of them. The M/T guys say 50-60 runs on their tire. The depth holes are shallower on the Mickey's. You can not rotate the Mickey's side to side, they are rotational . |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 849
Likes: 977
Liked 2,336 Times in 464 Posts
|
![]()
JR It really depends on the car. I found the Mickeys faster on every car I put them on. That's not comparing to the light weight Hoosier. I only have seen a few hundreds. They just don't last for me as long a Hoosiers. I get about 35 passes out of MT and about 55 out of Hoosiers. I'm also tough in the water box on my tires. BP
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|