|
![]() |
#1 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 81
Likes: 0
Liked 16 Times in 11 Posts
|
![]()
Hi
I need information. On my B/SA 1995 Camaro with LT1. At 101.5 timing, the valve clearance to piston is .018 int and .053 on exh. It is too tight or is normal. If i back the cam at 106, i have 32 int and 36 exh. All with .039 head gasket. what you do with this? Thank for your help |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Southeast Michigan
Posts: 908
Likes: 70
Liked 238 Times in 113 Posts
|
![]()
How are you measuring that ? Light checking spring, or clay, do you have a welded lifter ?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 81
Likes: 0
Liked 16 Times in 11 Posts
|
![]()
This is Roller Hydro. but I checked the lash with light spring and solid roller lifter. but i have same result with light spring and roller hydro.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 344
Likes: 63
Liked 207 Times in 44 Posts
|
![]()
what is the total deck, head gasket and piston depth?
Also what is cam ground on? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Mahopac, NY
Posts: 666
Likes: 48
Liked 113 Times in 9 Posts
|
![]()
Mark you have a pm.
__________________
Joe DeMarzo 1317 STK |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 81
Likes: 0
Liked 16 Times in 11 Posts
|
![]()
deck is .015 gasket .039 total .054.
but i want know? Have you ever seen this in stock eliminator for a hydraulic roller cam? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Northern New Jersey suburbs
Posts: 2,314
Likes: 25
Liked 544 Times in 213 Posts
|
![]()
Late model LT-1 minimum total deck with gasket is.062" IIRC. Your short .008" and would fail a tear down. I had one and built my own engine and had plenty of clearance with CP pistons and a Bullet cam. That cam was pretty aggressive so it seems odd to me you would have so little clearance.
__________________
Rich Biebel S/C 1479 Stock 147R Last edited by Rich Biebel; 06-14-2015 at 06:40 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Brookfield, CT
Posts: 708
Likes: 13
Liked 319 Times in 68 Posts
|
![]()
Same thing I was thinking Rich.
__________________
Lee Valentine 1661 STK |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 81
Likes: 0
Liked 16 Times in 11 Posts
|
![]()
I run with with Fel-Pro 9966 pt the thickness is .049 not .039 (it is my mistake) But it changes nothing to my question.
Rich ... you don't need to swear at me |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Northern New Jersey suburbs
Posts: 2,314
Likes: 25
Liked 544 Times in 213 Posts
|
![]()
It's been quite a while since I had that LT-1 Stocker Lee but I do recall doing that engine and being real happy I did not have to worry about a tight P-V issue. Still wish I had one as they are great fun to drive. Not fun to work on! Swear at you ? I don't have a clue as to what that statement means.
__________________
Rich Biebel S/C 1479 Stock 147R Last edited by Rich Biebel; 06-14-2015 at 07:57 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|