|
![]() |
#1 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Veradale WA/ Charleston SC
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]()
I have a 1972 chevelle SS body that I plan on making into a stocker. What do you guys think is the best combination choice with an automatic trans
- 1970 454 450 h.p. weight break- 8.58 and 3688 Lbs - 1971 454 425 h.p. weight break- 8.57 and 3599 Lbs Both motors can run the 401 aluminum heads according to the stock car classification, but the 401 head isnt listed on engine bluprints for 1971, only for corvette. Any info or comments is appreciated
__________________
Joel Oglesbee |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Las Vegas nv
Posts: 600
Likes: 18
Liked 66 Times in 37 Posts
|
![]()
70 402 is nice.
__________________
72 cutlass |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Murfreesboro TN
Posts: 5,093
Likes: 1,537
Liked 1,762 Times in 400 Posts
|
![]()
I have seen a couple of the iron head 450HP 1970 cars run well. that's a pretty decent factor. The only big difference between that and the 427/425 is about 0.240" of stroke. The 427/425 is pretty popular.
__________________
Alan Roehrich 212A G/S |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Texarkana Ark/TX
Posts: 2,446
Likes: 575
Liked 880 Times in 311 Posts
|
![]()
The 71 402 has better head choices and a little more ex lift, but I think it gives up a tiny bit of compression.
A real quick glance (hope I didn't overlook anyone) at Nitro joes Stats and I only see the '70 402 being run by a few and no '71-'72's being flogged.. that coud keep you safe from HP. Alan, I think that '71 iron headed 425 HP engine gives up compression from the '70 450 HP. I didn't figure it, but the dome comes over .200 down , but the head cc is 2 or 3 tighter. humm, Just looked at the '71 classification guide and they show a 420 HP factor for the iron head and a 430 factor for the " A" head in the Chevelle listing. Yet in the Specs they have a "C" on the '71 specs for the Alum head in corvette only... ??? I wonder which way it is. That '71 402 fits in the middle of the 11.0 -11.50 so I would think it could move up and down classes pretty easily. It might be able to move to 3, just have to do the numbers.
__________________
Adger Smith (Former SS) Last edited by Adger Smith; 08-20-2011 at 09:16 AM. Reason: Add Stuff |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Murfreesboro TN
Posts: 5,093
Likes: 1,537
Liked 1,762 Times in 400 Posts
|
![]()
Adger, I was comparing the 1970 454/450 to the to the 1966-69 427/425. The two biggest differences, with iron heads, are the 0.240" more stroke and the 1.880" exhaust valve the 454/450 gets. The rest is very similar.
__________________
Alan Roehrich 212A G/S |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Marion,In.
Posts: 267
Likes: 60
Liked 110 Times in 29 Posts
|
![]()
If you're open to something other than a Big Block,the best combination index wise for that body is the 350 like Katie Sepanek runs in I/SA. Rated at 270 hp in a Chevelle body and 278 in a Camaro. Just a thought.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: New Holland, PA Mooresville,NC
Posts: 1,163
Likes: 236
Liked 16 Times in 11 Posts
|
![]()
x2 Danny, and a hell of a lot cheaper to build.
__________________
Bob Pagano A/SA |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Wichita Ks
Posts: 383
Likes: 70
Liked 30 Times in 17 Posts
|
![]()
Go ahead and do the 1970 LS6, it's 12.5 + to 1 (measured) instead of the 71's 10.7 to 1 and C-12 is cheaper than C-11, LOL. Plus, you would be at the height of Chevelle power and you sound like a top of the BBC food chain guy to me.
I would love to see this car built and go in the 9's. Tracy |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|