|
![]() |
#61 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Miles From Nowhere
Posts: 7,815
Likes: 2,904
Liked 5,121 Times in 1,952 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
Go here, and you guys won't have to guess all the time: http://www.classracerinfo.com/ -39 h.p. from NHRA is a fair amount of help, I'd say. Still too heavy for G/Stock. Ray and Dennis built that car when there wasn't many good tires around, no 3 to 1 first gears, etc. , plus the record was in the 13's. Also , there wasn't a Camaro in every possible class. You'd break that think in half trying to be competitive in G/Stock , in today's world.
__________________
"We are lucky we don't get as much Government as we pay for." Will Rogers Last edited by Mark Yacavone; 01-05-2019 at 10:00 PM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#62 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 1,125
Likes: 1,179
Liked 684 Times in 289 Posts
|
![]()
I saw they gave them end of year HP help.They should give them another 20hp and whatever the 62 Fords need too.
Not sure if the Mopar needs help, but why not help all the old iron? So few of them left. Let them race! MJ |
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#63 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: On a hilltop in Pa.
Posts: 4,494
Likes: 3,596
Liked 7,731 Times in 1,739 Posts
|
![]()
We've got an old thread for that too Mike! I'll bring it back to the top!
__________________
Billy Nees 1188 STK, SS I'm not spending 100K to win 2K |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#64 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 1,125
Likes: 1,179
Liked 684 Times in 289 Posts
|
![]()
Thanks Billy
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#65 | |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: CT
Posts: 457
Likes: 1,802
Liked 347 Times in 151 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
![]()
__________________
Phil Molski PMR Performance S/C 1623 |
|
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#66 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 572
Likes: 38
Liked 53 Times in 38 Posts
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#67 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Miles From Nowhere
Posts: 7,815
Likes: 2,904
Liked 5,121 Times in 1,952 Posts
|
![]()
Don't worry. He's not getting any more. ;-)
__________________
"We are lucky we don't get as much Government as we pay for." Will Rogers |
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#68 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 1,125
Likes: 1,179
Liked 684 Times in 289 Posts
|
![]()
Lets not forget the Pontiac's...
http://georgeklass.net/ss.html |
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#69 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 615
Likes: 56
Liked 165 Times in 59 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#70 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Texarkana Ark/TX
Posts: 2,446
Likes: 575
Liked 880 Times in 311 Posts
|
![]()
Mike in the specs it looks like they have upped the '62 380 HP 409 to 400 HP in '63 and allowed the optional carb and optional big cam from the 62. ..
Something interesting is the '62 380 HP-409 is factored @ 365 NHRA HP and the 2X4 409 HP-409is factored @ 370 NHRA HP. The 1963 engines with the same engine specs are rated at a 400 HP ( 365 NHRA) and 425 HP ( 385 NHRA) All are Stick shift... Wouldn't the 1962 409 HP 409 with 2x4's be the one to run? (370 NHRA Factored)
__________________
Adger Smith (Former SS) Last edited by Adger Smith; 01-06-2019 at 10:32 PM. Reason: correction |
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
|
|