HOME FORUM RULES CONTACT
     
   
   

Go Back   CLASS RACER FORUM > Class Racer Forums > Stock and Super Stock
Register Photo Gallery FAQ Community Calendar

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-26-2010, 08:53 AM   #51
Ross Family Racing
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: St.Clairsville, Ohio
Posts: 459
Likes: 0
Liked 51 Times in 14 Posts
Default Re: Painting a new SS/GT G5 (Rich South)

Look at picture #2 and #3 and you will see that there is oem flooring in this car.
Darren, in the photo that Zac posted of the B&B car that the floorpans appeared the same as this car, just as the photos of this car looks the same as the photo of the B&B car. I did not start this thread to start a firestorm that has erupted.
Chris, your Mustang as a GT car is not the same as a front wheel drive conversion GT car.
Jeff Ross

Last edited by Ross Family Racing; 05-26-2010 at 09:02 AM.
Ross Family Racing is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-26-2010, 09:02 AM   #52
BlueOval Ralph
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 852
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: Painting a new SS/GT G5 (Rich South)

or a Probe???


Quote:
Originally Posted by Michael Lyons View Post
Didn't Rampy try to enter a SS/BS cavalier in a race a few years back and when they took the car thru tech, the tech guys wouldn't let them race it in S/S? And wasn't it a B&B built car? And then shortly there after NHRA had a rules update with pics in the national dragster about what is acceptable in S/S with pics and stuff? There was the rule about notching the rear bumpers for wheelie bars amongst other things? Didn't Doug Stewart get that car and end up racing it in comp for awhile? Thats what I remember, maybe I'm wrong. I guess as a chassis builder one has to push the rules just the same as anyone else to build the best performing car else you won't be a chassis builder for long. Course how can anyone say they took a FWD cobalt and stuffed a V8 in it and made it RWD and call much of anything about it stock anymore?... Goodluck to all involved and that is a beautiful car Mr South, you'll probably have more in paint and body work than I have in my car!
BlueOval Ralph is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-26-2010, 09:34 AM   #53
Gary Tackett
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Corona Ca.
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
Liked 13 Times in 3 Posts
Default Re: Painting a new SS/GT G5 (Rich South)

I can see a Large popcorn is in order for this thread................
Gary Tackett is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-26-2010, 09:45 AM   #54
Chris1529
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: West Virginia
Posts: 1,366
Likes: 6
Liked 70 Times in 29 Posts
Default Re: Painting a new SS/GT G5 (Rich South)

I think there needs to be another class for cars like this.

we would then have:

Stock
Super Stock
and.......Super Duper Stock!
__________________
Chris Bowman
The Mountain State Mustang
1984 Mustang GT350
Chris1529 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-26-2010, 09:48 AM   #55
Michael Lyons
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Garden City, MI
Posts: 226
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: Painting a new SS/GT G5 (Rich South)

Probe was built in 94? It has the stock floors(with box tubing welded into it) and firewall etc etc. It was built before they let you use a flat piece of sheet metal stuffed back under the dash and call it the new firewall location. I bet the driveshaft in my probes at least 18 inches longer than a cavalier, cobalt or sunfire. It has stock a arms modified like the rules allowed.

What was it DX said, "I got two words for you"...
Michael Lyons is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-26-2010, 10:31 AM   #56
Larry Fulton
Member
 
Larry Fulton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 271
Likes: 54
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: Painting a new SS/GT G5 (Rich South)

My Opinion -

This thread, is in no way meant to take away anything from the craftsmanship and / or quality of these new cars or their builders, because these cars ARE AWESOME!!

But what it does is bring light again, to the fact that NHRA has allowed some, to totally screw-up the Super Stock class and it's rules, because they didn't enforce what was already in place.

Besides Mike Lyons comments here about his Probe...
I'd like to see pictures and hear comments from somebody who has one of the Original Style FWD Conversion SS/GT cars like FJ Smith used to build, chime in also...

Tell us / show us how they compare to this latest acceptable version of a FWD - SS/GT car.

And then, if somebody can...
Explain to all of us, What actually happened @ the O.E.M. Factory Level (in Construction Methods or Designs) that "May Have" required this loosening of the rules to construct a New / Current GT car?
__________________
Larry Fulton

Last edited by Larry Fulton; 05-26-2010 at 10:53 AM.
Larry Fulton is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-26-2010, 11:58 AM   #57
Harry 6674
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 589
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: Painting a new SS/GT G5 (Rich South)

I've said it before here but in my opinion all these front wheel drive v8 cars belong in comp. If you couldn't buy it from the factory it shouldn't be in Super/Stock.
Harry 6674 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-26-2010, 12:16 PM   #58
Jeff Niceswanger
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 894
Likes: 684
Liked 1,031 Times in 368 Posts
Default Re: Painting a new SS/GT G5 (Rich South)

At the very least, the traditional rear wheel drive cars shoud not be grouped in with these when it comes to getting a horsepower hit.
Several of us got the sportsman committee to vote unanimously ( one person wasn't available for the vote) on such a rule a couple years back, but Glendoria shut the door on it.Quite often these cars get a combo hit, and the rear wheel drive , bigger, slower cars take the same hit. Its pretty well agreed apon, these little hot rods are somewhere betwen .07 and a tenth quicker than their big brothers.
__________________
Jeff Niceswanger 3740 SS

Last edited by Jeff Niceswanger; 05-26-2010 at 12:19 PM.
Jeff Niceswanger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-26-2010, 01:09 PM   #59
X-TECH MAN
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Lake Placid, Florida
Posts: 3,203
Likes: 1,047
Liked 235 Times in 110 Posts
Thumbs down Re: Painting a new SS/GT G5 (Rich South)

These new FWD conversions in S/S are more radical than "Grumpys" ProStock Vega built in 1972.
X-TECH MAN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-26-2010, 02:52 PM   #60
Hagen Gary
Live Reporter
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Cajun country
Posts: 339
Likes: 51
Liked 34 Times in 10 Posts
Default Re: Painting a new SS/GT G5 (Rich South)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jeff Niceswanger View Post
At the very least, the traditional rear wheel drive cars shoud not be grouped in with these when it comes to getting a horsepower hit.
Several of us got the sportsman committee to vote unanimously ( one person wasn't available for the vote) on such a rule a couple years back, but Glendoria shut the door on it.Quite often these cars get a combo hit, and the rear wheel drive , bigger, slower cars take the same hit. Its pretty well agreed apon, these little hot rods are somewhere betwen .07 and a tenth quicker than their big brothers.
Ding Ding... We have a winner. Why was this shut down by Glendora? Non-factory heads carry +5 hp. Why not FWD conversion? Every hit my engine combos took was from a FWD car. They make good looking super stockers but how can I compete in GT with two separate rules for them and my camaro? Wonder why we don't see the solstice or sky being built. Both are small,light, and very aerodynamic. No Camaros either. Why all the FWD cars? Is there that big of an advantage to a sheet metal floor? or is the advantage somewhere else?

Last edited by Hagen Gary; 05-26-2010 at 02:54 PM.
Hagen Gary is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:42 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.