Are synthetic oils and lubricants any quicker

[Ed Wright]

He's back Alan. LOL

[Jim Kaekel]

Originally Posted by Ed Wright

He's back Alan. LOL

He's a legend.......in his own mind.

[buzzinhalfdozen]

Originally Posted by 1320racer

This is a blanket statement...


and obviously NOT true based on my 1st hand experience with my race car!

Further, this statement...

infers that I am lying, which is not the case and is a personal attack.

Sorry to be the one to break it to you, but just maybe you aren't as good as you think you are being a gm "college" educated master technician and all. Just because you haven't been able to achieve the same, you chose to turn a blind eye and turn a deaf ear!

Newsflash...when you come out of your self induced coma and open your eyes and ears, you'll find that there are countless stock and super stock racers as well as many other class racers in other venues, sucessfully running an aluminum spool in cars heavier than 2800 lbs. including yours truely without issue or concern. Further, those that build these cars are installing aluminum spools without concern or issue too!!

As to a manufacturer's disclaimer, they are what they are, written by lawyers who's job it is to protect their clients from frivolous law suits.

That said, I don't care what you believe nor do I care what you or anyone else does with their car. I am simply offering the op as well those following this thread, my first hand experience as to what has worked for me with my race cars for over 2 decades. It is not my concern that this experience proves your and Allan's blanket statements to be untrue! Meanwhile, I don't make decisions whether it be business, personal or about my race program by committee no mind based on what I read on an internet forum, so I'll just keep doing what I'm doing regardless who here finds my statements unbelievable.

BTW, I've installed and setup the R&P in the 12 bolt of my former Chevelle for many years and now do the same with the 9" in my Firebird.

OK lets start with you've set up gears "for many years in your former chevelle"...so since you've claimed to make all these runs that equals 1 gear for the chevelle, since you've made it clear you simply cannot wear out or break a gear. Next the firebird looks like 2 for it, so a grand total of 3 gears. Now I NEVER claimed you cannot run an aluminum spool in these cars I SAID i run one in my own car, I said Mark Williams did NOT RECOMMEND IT! And I stated the reason they (MARK WILLIAMS) gave....reduced gear life, since the aluminum spool costs more what possible reason would they have for making this statement? So maybe reading or understanding English isn't your strong suit. I never inferred you were lying merely stated that your claim is unbelievable to me, being as you're the 1 and only person in nearly 30 years that's ever made such a claim. Could be your experience is simply not typical, as pretty much everyone that responded has not had a similar one. However at this point I'll have to simply ignore any further posts made by you on this subject as you have proven you know all and every thing you have is absolutely amazingly fast and durable.

[1320racer]

Originally Posted by Alan Roehrich

It wasn't my "blanket statement", Ed, it was a statement by the API, and by the OEM's, regarding their products.

But, of course, I'm sure you know more than the API, and all of the OE automotive manufacturers, combined.

Alan, tell me/us where I can find the data/field test/results from the API as well the OEM specifically as it relates to using these oils and lubricants in drag racing engines, transmissions, rears and cars!

Originally Posted by buzzinhalfdozen

OK lets start with you've set up gears "for many years in your former chevelle"...so since you've claimed to make all these runs that equals 1 gear for the chevelle, since you've made it clear you simply cannot wear out or break a gear. Next the firebird looks like 2 for it, so a grand total of 3 gears. Now I NEVER claimed you cannot run an aluminum spool in these cars I SAID i run one in my own car, I said Mark Williams did NOT RECOMMEND IT! your claim is unbelievable to me, being as you're the 1 and only person in nearly 30 years that's ever made such a claim. Could be your experience is simply not typical, as pretty much everyone that responded has not had a similar one.

Being able to perform sucessfully simple arithmetic must not be a requirement for admission into the gm "college" or a prerequisite to earning your degree as a "master technician".

I've stated in this thread that I typically got 200 passes on a set of gears in my former chevelle which btw, I'm told is about 100 more than a similar weight B/SA Stocker with a 12 bolt. I've also stated that I typically make 250 passes a season so one with a 3rd grade education could conclude that I changed the gears in my chevelle every season and I raced that car for 17 years but I only started doing them in '97 IIRC, after discovering they were broken after parking for the bracket finals. The Firebird is on it's 2nd set of gear since I have own it which btw, as of the last day of this season has over 200 passes on them!

You absolutely infered I was lying!

As to what you said Mark Williams doesn't recommend, again a legal disclaimer as with most if not all racing parts and again noted stock/super stock chassis builders have and continue to install aluminum spools in cars weighing in excess of 2800 lb.s without issue or concern.

As for my truth and facts that you refuse to believe, call unbelieveable and refer to as a claim, how many of all those you've discussed this issue with over 30 years(btw, how old are you) were bracket racers, a bracket racer who makes at least 250 passes a season and a bracket racer that ran/runs a MW "Pro Stock" 3rd member with an aluminum spool in a state of the art super stock car weighing at least 3100+ lbs.?

[Rich67stang]

How come every time 1320Racer posts, it turns into a "**** Show" and the thread becomes useless?...I was interested in this thread. Is it worth it to run a "Pro Stock" third members over "standard" type third members? what would be the average et gain, if that can be measured.

[1320racer]

Originally Posted by Rich67stang

How come every time 1320Racer posts, it turns into a "**** Show" and the thread becomes useless?

I don't know, maybe it's because some here think that because they race stock/super stock they are smarter and more experienced than bracket racers no mind this bracket racer who runs a top shelf program and makes more passes every season than most stock/super stock racers.

[FED 387]

Now--- back to the original question-- Are synthetics any quicker or slower than other forms of rear gear lubes----- Do not care about gear life only results alsio I do not care about your technical expertise or lack of expertise WHAT WERE THE RESULTS ----Are they faster or slower and if so what were your results --Did you pick up or slow down??--Your experience please--No guesses or I think answers ONLYconcrete back to back results please!!!--Thank you FED387

[buzzinhalfdozen]

FED 387, please don't hold your breath on any actual reply from mr.1320 he has done everything BUT answer the question. Maybe when he's done blowing smoke up every ones wassu about how fast, reliable, and consistent his ride is.... Wait a moment, now it's 200 passes....well that's a bit less than 700 isn't it? BTW a recomendation from Mark Williams IS NOT A LEGAL DISCLAIMER.

[1320racer]

post #2...

Originally Posted by 1320racer

more ET to be had in running less lube/oil than there is in type.

[joespanova]

HERE:
This should help everyone clam down.