|
![]() |
#31 | |
Junior Member
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Alton, Missouri
Posts: 84
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
__________________
69 Pure/Stock Yenko Camaro 11.73 @ 118 |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#32 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Glendale, Arizona
Posts: 3,044
Likes: 712
Liked 1,580 Times in 582 Posts
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#33 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Alton, Missouri
Posts: 84
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]()
So, why isn't it legal? Chevrolet produced 177 of these cars...that's right, CHEVROLET. Yenko Chevrolet got 175, and 2 went to Canada. Nothing fancy about them, just plain-jane Novas with the LT-1 & 4.10 gears, and your choice of transmission...granted, Yenko hung stripes/emblems on the majority of them (not all), but that was about as far as he went, unless the customer asked for more.
When I get home tonight, I'll dig out the Yenko-->NHRA correspondance and see about posting some of it. Then maybe someone can tell me *why* it never happened... HERE IS SOME LIGHT READING ON '70 YENKO NOVAS
__________________
69 Pure/Stock Yenko Camaro 11.73 @ 118 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#34 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Lake Tapps, Washington
Posts: 137
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]()
I tried to help a friend get the "Duece" into the SCCG a few years ago and ran into a problem finding original documentation to submit to NHRA. Many of the Yenco troops are long on tribal knowlege but short on the written word. Somewhere there is documentation or clay tablets or something to verify what we all know and I have found NHRA to be very receptive to this approach in the past. It does chap me that Shelby can wiggle their nose and get absolute BS approved but if it's a Chevrolet; bulletproof documentation and three part harmony is required. It would be OK if all scrutiny was equal. The LT-1 Nova (and others) belong in the SCCG, if I knew where the bones were buried I would dig them up and submit them today.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#35 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Alton, Missouri
Posts: 84
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]()
Tom: what info do you need? I can supply a large marjority of the VIN #s of the 177 cars...lots of advertising material...even names/addys of original owners still with the car...and as mentioned above, the original correspondance where all of this took place back in 1970.
__________________
69 Pure/Stock Yenko Camaro 11.73 @ 118 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#36 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Murfreesboro TN
Posts: 5,111
Likes: 1,570
Liked 1,815 Times in 413 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
__________________
Alan Roehrich 212A G/S |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#37 |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Ontario Canada
Posts: 411
Likes: 1
Liked 19 Times in 7 Posts
|
![]()
Id rather see the LT1 Nova accepted rather than the Roush Mustang. They should let the Yenko/Moton/Dana Cars run AA/SA.
__________________
Tony Valerio 1968 Camaro 1700 IHRA H/CM 1701 NHRA SS/?A |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#38 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Glendale, Arizona
Posts: 3,044
Likes: 712
Liked 1,580 Times in 582 Posts
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#39 | |
VIP Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Glendale, Arizona
Posts: 3,044
Likes: 712
Liked 1,580 Times in 582 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
The Roush cars are no more different than the new S/C Shelby Mustang...so, let's also ban them too!!! |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#40 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Alton, Missouri
Posts: 84
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]()
Decal on cover of original folder from Yenko Chevrolet...
__________________
69 Pure/Stock Yenko Camaro 11.73 @ 118 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|