|
![]() |
#21 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Div. 6, Eastern, WA
Posts: 696
Likes: 2,309
Liked 220 Times in 105 Posts
|
![]()
7500 RPM ? Not with the stock rods. With Eagle or better rods, yeah. And GOOD springs. And Balance. Oil system is the same as a cleveland so it's not gonna wanna go that high, and, and....................................
__________________
Dave Noll, E/FS ,L/SA 6526 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#22 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Arkansas - In the middle of everything.
Posts: 1,983
Likes: 54
Liked 726 Times in 177 Posts
|
![]()
. . . . and 1 hp/cu in out of that whale is a lot of blubber!!!
Hey, Vic! Why don't you do something really wild? . . like the 400M for Q/SA at a svelte 4590 lbs? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#23 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: NS CANADA
Posts: 736
Likes: 687
Liked 187 Times in 68 Posts
|
![]()
Same carb(1.21)/valves(2.06)/intake and lift is like .406 to .428 compared to the 351M so I think it'd be better.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#24 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Miles From Nowhere
Posts: 7,475
Likes: 2,653
Liked 4,578 Times in 1,733 Posts
|
![]()
There ya go...351M, as a Landau..U/SA!
__________________
We are lucky we don't get as much Government as we pay for..... Will Rogers |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#25 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Arkansas - In the middle of everything.
Posts: 1,983
Likes: 54
Liked 726 Times in 177 Posts
|
![]()
351 blueprints under 9:1 compression; 400 is 9.7. 50 more cubic inches.
__________________
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#26 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Div. 6, Eastern, WA
Posts: 696
Likes: 2,309
Liked 220 Times in 105 Posts
|
![]()
OK. Both the 351M & 400M use the same size 2bbl (1.686/1.21 ) the same heads with the same valves. The 351 has a little over 8 1/2:1 compression & the 400M a little under 9 1/4:1. Yeah the cams are different but with what cam grinders can do these days, I think that's pretty much a wash. (probably wrong).
The 75 & 74 460"s The valves, cams are the same the compression's are similar But as Billy reminded us: Quote:
[IMG] [/IMG]
__________________
Dave Noll, E/FS ,L/SA 6526 Last edited by Dave Noll; 01-01-2015 at 12:56 AM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#27 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: NS CANADA
Posts: 736
Likes: 687
Liked 187 Times in 68 Posts
|
![]()
351vs400 I just figure with the same top end the smaller cubes it's got to be fed better. Same as a 302 is ok but the 351W is a pig cause it uses the same head/valves.
50 cubes in that case is a detriment not a bonus. A point in compression is obviously nothing to sneeze at either, but there are more factors in the 351's favour than the 400's. The 460 is just cool regardless ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#28 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: wv
Posts: 882
Likes: 42
Liked 56 Times in 21 Posts
|
![]()
piston in block
__________________
Vic Guilmino 1129 STK |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#29 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: malden,ma
Posts: 228
Likes: 230
Liked 81 Times in 36 Posts
|
![]()
anyone notice the wing on that gt/fa car....I'm no ford expert but? also I have a
1979 ranchero..wonder how that would hook up with a 460... |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#30 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Miles From Nowhere
Posts: 7,475
Likes: 2,653
Liked 4,578 Times in 1,733 Posts
|
![]()
Pic? Link?
__________________
We are lucky we don't get as much Government as we pay for..... Will Rogers |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|