HOME FORUM RULES CONTACT
     
   
   

Go Back   CLASS RACER FORUM > Class Racer Forums > Stock and Super Stock
Register Photo Gallery FAQ Community Calendar

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-23-2012, 04:50 PM   #131
randy wilson
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: N/A
Posts: 882
Likes: 0
Liked 22 Times in 22 Posts
Default Re: Bring back super/mod...

No, automatics are ok with me, but you would absolutely have to give the 2 speed a weight brake. Not so concerned with the 3 speed high dollar autos, but in this situation, a 2 speed will be at a disadvantage to a clutch. Line locs fine with me.
__________________
don,t have one
randy wilson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-23-2012, 07:37 PM   #132
Dick Butler
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Richmond Indiana
Posts: 1,196
Likes: 5
Liked 32 Times in 19 Posts
Default Re: Bring back super/mod...

PG cars got 100 lb lighter car in Modified before didnt they? or was it more?
Dick Butler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-23-2012, 09:23 PM   #133
SSDiv6
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Glendale, Arizona
Posts: 3,044
Likes: 712
Liked 1,583 Times in 582 Posts
Default Re: Bring back super/mod...

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dick Butler View Post
PG cars got 100 lb lighter car in Modified before didnt they? or was it more?
This is the way the current rules read:

WEIGHT
Cars with fully automatic transmissions with converter may remove
up to 5 percent or 250 pounds, whichever is less, from regular class
weight; may be under posted minimum weight. Cars weighed with
driver; minimum weight includes driver.
SSDiv6 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-23-2012, 11:12 PM   #134
randy wilson
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: N/A
Posts: 882
Likes: 0
Liked 22 Times in 22 Posts
Default Re: Bring back super/mod...

But I think that's rated against a clutchless now, am I right?
__________________
don,t have one
randy wilson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-24-2012, 07:30 AM   #135
Dick Butler
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Richmond Indiana
Posts: 1,196
Likes: 5
Liked 32 Times in 19 Posts
Default Re: Bring back super/mod...

With all the support here and good ideas they are varied levels of motor cost and complexity. Should a poll be taken of most important factors for the cars? Cost, simplicity by sealing them, claimer heads ok, etc?
Dick Butler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-24-2012, 08:49 AM   #136
randy wilson
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: N/A
Posts: 882
Likes: 0
Liked 22 Times in 22 Posts
Default Re: Bring back super/mod...

Dick, my vote has got to be claimer heads, with a $500 exchange. It's simple, and logical. Also, it doesn't take hard work out of the equation. Sealed, or claimer motors destroys all that. Also, heads is what keeps most out of comp. They change designs seems like weekly. Also, I think it's important to keep the visual performance parts to a minimal, as we've discussed. I think a spec tire, fuel, and possibly rear gear, as long as it's entertaining. I love the fact that brodix evened up the competition, to where no one can bitch. Also, things I've brought up would keep valve train cost affordable.
__________________
don,t have one
randy wilson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-24-2012, 08:52 AM   #137
SSDiv6
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Glendale, Arizona
Posts: 3,044
Likes: 712
Liked 1,583 Times in 582 Posts
Default Re: Bring back super/mod...

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dick Butler View Post
With all the support here and good ideas they are varied levels of motor cost and complexity. Should a poll be taken of most important factors for the cars? Cost, simplicity by sealing them, claimer heads ok, etc?
Just like Randy said, let's start with a Spec cylinder head:

http://www.brodix.com/heads/spec.php

Then: no Titanium valves, no external oil pump, no sheet metal intake only cast intake, one single 750 CFM carb, no crank trigger, no external vacuum pump, any compression, limit tire width to 11.5", 358 CID max engine. Must maintain OEM cylinder bore spacing, OEM engine deck height and engine block must have a OEM part number.

I think this would maintain an even competition and keep costs down for the class.
SSDiv6 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-24-2012, 09:39 AM   #138
randy wilson
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: N/A
Posts: 882
Likes: 0
Liked 22 Times in 22 Posts
Default Re: Bring back super/mod...

I agree, but that would put cars in SS\AS. I have no problem with any of this, but I'm only one person.
__________________
don,t have one
randy wilson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-24-2012, 09:48 AM   #139
randy wilson
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: N/A
Posts: 882
Likes: 0
Liked 22 Times in 22 Posts
Default Re: Bring back super/mod...

Also, the OEM part number thing, probably would add cost to the engine. The SHP stuff from dart is cheaper. I'm so glad someone agrees on the brodix spec deal. Let's face it, they've had lots of years to work it out. And you know they would be on board big time.
__________________
don,t have one
randy wilson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-24-2012, 09:53 AM   #140
Michael Kilduff
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Carolina Beach, NC
Posts: 281
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: Bring back super/mod...

Quote:
Originally Posted by SSDiv6 View Post
Just like Randy said, let's start with a Spec cylinder head:

http://www.brodix.com/heads/spec.php

Then: no Titanium valves, no external oil pump, no sheet metal intake only cast intake, one single 750 CFM carb, no crank trigger, no external vacuum pump, any compression, limit tire width to 11.5", 358 CID max engine. Must maintain OEM cylinder bore spacing, OEM engine deck height and engine block must have a OEM part number.

I think this would maintain an even competition and keep costs down for the class.
Excellent ideas.

I don't think giving weight breaks for automatics would be in the best interest of the class. I understand you need participation but the thing that would make a class like this unique-and popular-would be higher rpms and manual transmissions.

At our local tracks the only time a significant number of fans show up is for Pro Mod shows or when the Classic Gearjammers are in town.

I think a 50 lb weight reduction for pre 1973 cars would benfit the class as well.

I really doubt the NHRA would have any interest in such a class-look at how long it took them to bring Pro Mod into the program and they still treat those guys/girls like second rate citizens.

A class like this would certainly have to start at the grass roots level, and that won't be easy. If some people really want to do something like this I'm willing to help in any way possible-I'm in South East NC. I've got one car that could fit this bill, just tell me the rules before it gets to the chassis shop this winter.

And I gotta say I am very suprised Doyle Evans hasn't posted in this thread yet. I know he's reading it and has a '67 Vette just itching for a class like this
I
__________________
IHRA STK 932 O/SA
Michael Kilduff is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:34 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.