HOME FORUM RULES CONTACT
     
   
   

Go Back   CLASS RACER FORUM > Class Racer Forums > Stock and Super Stock
Register Photo Gallery FAQ Community Calendar

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-31-2010, 09:01 AM   #121
W J
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Paxton, Massachusetts
Posts: 638
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: 2011 Stock/Super Stock Rule Changes

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hurley1828 View Post
Hi my name is Shelby Hurley and I had previously wrote a letter to NHRA concerning a stocker rules change requesting the year limit cutoff to be pushed back to 1955 and posted it on classracer to discuss views on the situation. And I would like to thank everyone that supported the stockers rule change, those that wrote into NHRA, and NHRA itself for the change in the upcoming race season.
We were told by so many people that this would "Never" happen, however, my dad and I are both very excited that our 1955 Chevy Belair stocker can now run both IHRA and NHRA.

Thanks Again!
Shelby Hurley
I'm also happy about the yr. limit cutoff change for cars competing in stock. The dual quad and fuel-injected '57 model Chevrolets and Corvettes have always been big favorites of mine, but I do want to see, and am concerned about NHRA's new "accepted engine block list" for these cars competing in stock. It'll be nice to maybe see some of those fast '57 Fords and T-Birds competeting in stock once again, also. WJ
W J is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-31-2010, 10:12 AM   #122
Michael Kilduff
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Carolina Beach, NC
Posts: 281
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: 2011 Stock/Super Stock Rule Changes

Shelby,
Congradulations on getting the the year limit cutoff pushed back. I for one think the 55-59 models are some of the best looking cars ever made and are as responsible for the success of drag racing as any other era of automobiles. These cars were truly the beginning of 'stock' cars being bought to drive on the street and to be raced on the weekends, and as such it is only fitting that they should be allowed to compete in Stock Eliminator.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Hurley1828 View Post
Hi my name is Shelby Hurley and I had previously wrote a letter to NHRA concerning a stocker rules change requesting the year limit cutoff to be pushed back to 1955 and posted it on classracer to discuss views on the situation. And I would like to thank everyone that supported the stockers rule change, those that wrote into NHRA, and NHRA itself for the change in the upcoming race season.
We were told by so many people that this would "Never" happen, however, my dad and I are both very excited that our 1955 Chevy Belair stocker can now run both IHRA and NHRA.

Thanks Again!
Shelby Hurley
__________________
IHRA STK 932 O/SA
Michael Kilduff is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-31-2010, 12:23 PM   #123
Ken Haase
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 233
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Talking Re: 2011 Stock/Super Stock Rule Changes

I wonder if we will see Dave Boertman in a '59 Chevy again?
Ken Haase is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-31-2010, 05:15 PM   #124
Fred Holdorf
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Minden, Nv
Posts: 44
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: 2011 Stock/Super Stock Rule Changes

I seem unable to asertain whether or not NHRA will also release the engine specs on 55 thru 59, Fords, Buicks, Oldsmobiles, Pontiacs, etc. If they do not, as I believe they won't, then this matter is mute, in my opinion. I will be sorry to see that happen, but understand that NHRA still has the specs on Studebakers, Fords, etc. and could really make it interesting!
Fred
Fred Holdorf is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-31-2010, 05:37 PM   #125
GarysZ24
VIP Member
 
GarysZ24's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Tempe, Az.
Posts: 1,270
Likes: 918
Liked 238 Times in 94 Posts
Send a message via MSN to GarysZ24 Send a message via Yahoo to GarysZ24
Default Re: 2011 Stock/Super Stock Rule Changes

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bimbo Jones View Post
I have only met a few racers that honestly prefer being the slower car all the rest are just racers that say that because they can't afford to be the fastest car. We've had the Xmas tree since the early 60's but until the reaction timer was introduced the slower car didn't know he had done a better job of driving only to be eliminated. Just as the best light's reward comes as a finish line cushion. The worst red light should be grounds for elimination. I'd like to hear some more about all those advantages that the slower cars have other than costs. LOL Maybe the rules haven't changed in the past 45 years but a whole bunch of variables sure have been introduced in that time that these old rules do not take into account.
Well said Bimbo Jones, well said..
__________________
Gary Hampton
'86 Z24,173 V6
CF/S #5824 (#78 in 2021)
GarysZ24 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-31-2010, 05:51 PM   #126
Ed Fernandez
Veteran Member
 
Ed Fernandez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: NOO JOISEY nexta NOO YAWK
Posts: 5,879
Likes: 38
Liked 100 Times in 45 Posts
Default Re: 2011 Stock/Super Stock Rule Changes

Iwould think of the worst foul rule as drag racing welfare.I don't need it.I think the pressure
of being the first makes me a better racer.Not necessarily a good one ,but a better one than I think I would be.
Why does everybody want to keep changing the rules?We need to change NHRA's
attitude towards enforcing them.The rule book,if followed correctly is pretty damn good as it is.
__________________
Former NHRA #1945
Former IHRA #1945
T/SA
Ed Fernandez is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-31-2010, 06:05 PM   #127
GarysZ24
VIP Member
 
GarysZ24's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Tempe, Az.
Posts: 1,270
Likes: 918
Liked 238 Times in 94 Posts
Send a message via MSN to GarysZ24 Send a message via Yahoo to GarysZ24
Talking Re: 2011 Stock/Super Stock Rule Changes

Quote:
Originally Posted by art leong View Post
I have one gripe about being the slower car.
My neck hurts.
Does anyone realize how fast I have to spin my head when a car goes by me 55 to 60 mph faster than me? It worst than watching a Nascar race. It's like a tennis match on steroids.

LOL LOL
Amen Art,

The only reason mine doesn't hurt is because I haven't been able to afford racing much these last 2yrs (changes to that are in the works)...trust me if I could afford a faster car, I'd be shopping for one...my car may be competitive against the faster stockers as things are now, but it's more successful against imports in bracket racing. Someday one of my dream Mopars (or a Jody Lang type Malibu), will grace my budget, and then I'll have a chance to be both the tortoise (I don't think that's the correct spelling?), and the hare...
__________________
Gary Hampton
'86 Z24,173 V6
CF/S #5824 (#78 in 2021)

Last edited by GarysZ24; 10-31-2010 at 07:12 PM.
GarysZ24 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-31-2010, 06:43 PM   #128
Jack Matyas
Live Reporter
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Bethlehem , PA -Christmas City , USA
Posts: 4,930
Likes: 406
Liked 2,051 Times in 399 Posts
Send a message via AIM to Jack Matyas
Smile Re: 2011 Stock/Super Stock Rule Changes

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ed Fernandez View Post
Iwould think of the worst foul rule as drag racing welfare.I don't need it.I think the pressure
of being the first makes me a better racer.Not necessarily a good one ,but a better one than I think I would be.
Why does everybody want to keep changing the rules?We need to change NHRA's
attitude towards enforcing them.The rule book,if followed correctly is pretty damn good as it is.
Ed -- Good thing its Holloween because its downright scary that you and I agree on this ............ leave the Rulebook alone .BTW , Tommy has been telling me lately that his ears are ringing -- now , after reading about your engine exit I understand why .
__________________
Jack Matyas 1547 FS/C 2015 Camaro COPO # 62- 2012 Camaro Convertible COPO
Jack Matyas is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-31-2010, 09:54 PM   #129
Jack McCarthy
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: lyndon ky. ... louisville area
Posts: 1,322
Likes: 29
Liked 476 Times in 117 Posts
Default Re: 2011 Stock/Super Stock Rule Changes

jack matayas... you do remember i had the rule changed to allow 3 speed automatics in 1957 - 1961 full size chevys due to the 3 speed turboglide ... only high HP 348s and 6 cylinders cannot use the 3 speed.

jack mccarthy

why the stupid valve spring rule ?
__________________
Jack McCarthy 3609 STK
"the Captain"
Jack McCarthy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-31-2010, 10:27 PM   #130
Ed Fernandez
Veteran Member
 
Ed Fernandez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: NOO JOISEY nexta NOO YAWK
Posts: 5,879
Likes: 38
Liked 100 Times in 45 Posts
Default Re: 2011 Stock/Super Stock Rule Changes

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jack McCarthy View Post
jack matayas... you do remember i had the rule changed to allow 3 speed automatics in 1957 - 1961 full size chevys due to the 3 speed turboglide ... only high HP 348s and 6 cylinders cannot use the 3 speed.

jack mccarthy

why the stupid valve spring rule ?
Speaking of valve springs what's the open/closed specs on the various CJ and DP springs?Seems like someone said once on here that if you limited the open pressure specs then all the exotic stuff you see now would be useless and more parity would result.
If you limit the older combos and the factory specs on the new cars are somewhere near the front end coil spring #s on my car,then you hurt the older combos even more than they are now.Can someone explain this in a rational manner?
__________________
Former NHRA #1945
Former IHRA #1945
T/SA
Ed Fernandez is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:19 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.