|
|
![]() |
#1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2024
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 610
Likes: 1,833
Liked 1,362 Times in 367 Posts
|
![]()
Ideally to give combos that have been factored out of existence a chance to come back. And for the complete and utter chaos it would bring in the meantime. It would be glorious. mfrs out here running 2 seconds under for a race or two just because they suddenly could. It'd be wild. No it's not gonna happen, but good lord would it be something to behold
__________________
Dawson Pauley #2827 N/SA 1980 Malibu SW 2S 305/180 #2827 S/ST 1978 Mazda RX7 w/ 383 sbc/glide |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Elysburg, Pa
Posts: 733
Likes: 367
Liked 327 Times in 121 Posts
|
![]()
[QUOTE=JP1738;710174]Ideally to give combos that have been factored out of existence a chance to come back. And for the complete and utter chaos it would bring in the meantime. It would be glorious. mfrs out here running 2 seconds under for a race or two just because they suddenly could. It'd be wild. No it's not gonna happen, but good lord would it be something to behold[/Q
A lot of combos that were factored too high to ever be raced finally got reduced in the 90s and early 2Ks. It would be fun to run GT with the 72 engine HP ratings, and of course N/SA 72 340 Dusters going 10.60s. |
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 449
Likes: 881
Liked 609 Times in 140 Posts
|
![]()
A lot of thoughful replies; some I agree with and some I don't. But in my mind, none of them matter since the NHRA has made it clear they want to avoid teardowns at any price. If a racer really wanted to have an unfair advantage right now, they could easily do it if they knew there was almost no chance they'd be checked.
Won't get into the "in my day" thing, but that's something I would never do nor 99% of the racers I've met through the years. I have the strong impression that standard has changed. |
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#4 | |
VIP Member
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Shelby, NC
Posts: 1,832
Likes: 2,201
Liked 2,364 Times in 560 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
There have always been soft combinations. The factories have always worked it. In some cases combinations were overlooked for whatever reason. In others, people just hadn't been keeping up with the rule changes. Either way, sometimes, you have "oops moments". You also have those guys that are "FINALLY COOL" and just cant keep it in their pants....
__________________
Daren Poole-Adams NHRA Stock/SS 2007 |
|
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#5 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: waldorf
Posts: 222
Likes: 14
Liked 55 Times in 29 Posts
|
![]()
This is the reason why they shouldn?t lower the indexes.3, because racers will build engines based on the current tech. We are already pretty much allowed Super Stock engines in stock and comp engines in super stock. The only thing to keep racers from pushing the boundaries is getting hp. If not we will be dropping indexes every other year.
Last edited by j gardiner; 03-04-2025 at 02:49 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|