|
|
View Poll Results: Should roller rockers be allowed on all stockers? | |||
Yes |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
113 | 53.81% |
No |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
97 | 46.19% |
Voters: 210. You may not vote on this poll |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Mesa, Arizona
Posts: 3,048
Likes: 712
Liked 1,608 Times in 585 Posts
|
![]()
Mopars, with the exception of the Max Wedge and 273 engines, they had stamped steel shaft rockers from the factory. I would say that approximately 20 years ago, they were allowed to use the ductile iron rockers based on their availability in the same engine family: 273 and 426 Max Wedge. (Big Blocks: 361, 383, 400, 413, 426 and 440) (Small Blocks: 273, 318, 340 and 360). Ford 390, 427 and 428 had ductile iron shaft rocker arms from the factory.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
VIP Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Anthem, Arizona
Posts: 2,766
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
And to ad to that, you won't have to dig too deep to find a MOPAR racer that had problems punching out pushrod cups on his stamped steel rockers prior to the allowance of these non-OEM ductile iron rockers by NHRA. I believe that occured in the mid-to-late 1970's (1978?). Interestingly, this was a problem BEFORE dwell-nosed cam lobes and super high tension valve springs were the mainstay of fast Stock Eliminator cars of the last decade. No, this is not a new problem! ![]()
__________________
Jeff Lee 7494 D/S '70 AMX |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
|
![]()
So which combo's use the " as produced " valve train? Completely stock?
__________________
Steve Calabro 1199 STK, SS |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Anthem, Arizona
Posts: 2,766
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
|
![]()
Anybody that wants to...
__________________
Jeff Lee 7494 D/S '70 AMX |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Mesa, Arizona
Posts: 3,048
Likes: 712
Liked 1,608 Times in 585 Posts
|
![]()
Prior to the new rule that allows the use of studs and guideplates the following makes still use "as produced valve train": Oldsmobile, Buick, Ford Small blocks. One exception with the Ford small blocks is the 289 HP and the Boss 302/351 (stud/guideplate), and the Non-Boss Clevelands, that are allowed to use the Crane Cams conversion kit. All other makes have stud/guideplate provisions; Chevy and Pontiac have a great selection of rocker arm options.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Anthem, Arizona
Posts: 2,766
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
|
![]()
Speaking for the few AMC racers out there, all applications use a stamped steel rocker arm over a ball / stud assembly with no guide plates (prior to last week). Looks just like a SBC arrangement but the rocker folcrum cenerline to tip is about .200" longer and offer's a 1.55 ratio (my testing found 1.53 typical). AMC uses a 5/16" pushrod and a 3/8" screw-in stud. Upgrades can be made to a 3/8" pushrod and a 7/16" rocker stud from a BBC. Bracket racers typically use a modified Pontiac guide plate if neccessary.
As stated by SSDiv6 ..."Chevy and Pontiac have a great selection of rocker arm options" Yes, especially Pontiacs. I suspect a Pontiac racer or two might not like everybody else having roller rockers because that opens up the door to everybody having the same ratio's available. I'm not personally aware of any conclusive evidence that shows a 1.65 rocker ratio has a decided advantage over a 1.5 rocker ratio (both theroretical ratio's) in a Stocker application (both offering the same gross valve lift) but I would suspect there is some advantage although miniscule. Personally, I always built a cam around the rocker ratio.
__________________
Jeff Lee 7494 D/S '70 AMX |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |
VIP Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Mesa, Arizona
Posts: 3,048
Likes: 712
Liked 1,608 Times in 585 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Member
|
![]()
As stated by SSDiv6 ..."Chevy and Pontiac have a great selection of rocker arm options"
What are they? Are they good? What about adjustable pushrods? Did they come from the factory?
__________________
Steve Calabro 1199 STK, SS |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 | |
VIP Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Mesa, Arizona
Posts: 3,048
Likes: 712
Liked 1,608 Times in 585 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
The funny and interesting part of this discussion is that many of you are bringing up issues that have been in the rule book for over 20 years such as adjustable pushrods and the ductile iron rocker arms in Mopars and at the time, no one made an issue of it until now. Do not get me wrong, I recognize many of you have devoted most of your life to a few makes of engine manufacturers and are not knowledgeable on other makes. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Member
|
![]()
Steve, the aftermarket has lots of offerings for both makes with better materials and treatments.
I have tried them all at great expense. The bottom line is that they are still stamped steel and not made to do what we are asking. As many have stated roller rockers are not a performance advantage. Don't you think the adjustable pushrod is a performace advantage that was allowed? Adjustable rockers on cars that they never came on? ETC. The funny and interesting part of this discussion is that many of you are bringing up issues that have been in the rule book for over 20 years such as adjustable pushrods and the ductile iron rocker arms in Mopars and at the time, no one made an issue of it until now. Do not get me wrong, I recognize many of you have devoted most of your life to a few makes of engine manufacturers and are not knowledgeable on other makes. SSDiv6: This is just the point i'm trying to make. Thing are allowed when there is a problem. Stamped steel rockers are a big problem.
__________________
Steve Calabro 1199 STK, SS |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|