|
|
![]() |
#1 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 51
Likes: 38
Liked 11 Times in 4 Posts
|
![]()
Could you run the 390 combo in a 1966 Comet Post Sedan? Not listed in the current rule book, but I think it used to be a long time ago. One would have to petition NHRA? Sorry, did not mean to hi-jack, just thinking out loud since the question of '66 v '67 came up.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Arkansas - In the middle of everything.
Posts: 2,002
Likes: 64
Liked 783 Times in 195 Posts
|
![]()
If it is not in the class guide, it is not a combination that is allowed to race. I have CG sheets back into the early 90s and it is not in any of them.
__________________
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#3 |
Live Reporter
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Hickory, Ky
Posts: 10,669
Likes: 1,964
Liked 10,849 Times in 2,254 Posts
|
![]()
I have some sheets that go back to the Sixties. One of my favorites is, Dome must be .450" high or close to that verbiage.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Woodburn, Or
Posts: 685
Likes: 83
Liked 805 Times in 245 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#5 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 230
Likes: 1
Liked 81 Times in 45 Posts
|
![]()
Here in division 4 there is a 66 Cyclone running the 390 combo.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 51
Likes: 38
Liked 11 Times in 4 Posts
|
![]()
Yeah, If it is John Cox then it is a '66 Cyclone Hardtop. Probably have to get with NHRA on this one.
TY |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Miles From Nowhere
Posts: 7,827
Likes: 2,919
Liked 5,137 Times in 1,960 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
NHRA? Forget about it. If they made an omission , they will fix it. If Ford never submitted it, that's your problem. Sounds like the case here. Been down this road before. ![]()
__________________
"We are lucky we don't get as much Government as we pay for." Will Rogers Last edited by Mark Yacavone; 12-26-2024 at 09:38 PM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#8 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 51
Likes: 38
Liked 11 Times in 4 Posts
|
![]()
Yep. You are probably right. The 67's got all the love.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Arkansas - In the middle of everything.
Posts: 2,002
Likes: 64
Liked 783 Times in 195 Posts
|
![]()
Something to consider is the marketing psychology of that era. It was not uncommon for the manufacturers to offer a package directed to the performance market and configure it so that it would carry some image of exclusivity. Note the SS Chevelle, GTO, Plymouth GTX, etc.which were hardtops and convertibles only. The performance engines were not available in the other model series and espcially not sedans and station wagons. The 390 engine was exclusive to the Comet Cyclone GT which was hardtop and convertible only. Same with the Fairlane GT/GTA in 1966.
__________________
![]() Last edited by Dwight Southerland; 12-30-2024 at 04:25 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
|
|