|
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Marion,In.
Posts: 267
Likes: 60
Liked 110 Times in 29 Posts
|
![]()
[QUOTE=Adger Smith;692814]I'm not a real Q-Jet tuner, but I question the 6.5 lb fuel pressure.
N/S area vs the small float What do the experts say about that? I have had Q-Jet customers that are very particular about regulator location and fuel line routing to the carb... OK What you say Q-Jet experts??[/QUOTE Quadrajet fuel pressure depends on the needle & seat size. They are available from .110 - .150. The .110 can handle more pressure than the .150. My choice is the .135 for all applications. It has been used in two of my Super Stock customer's cars who have run in the 8 second zone. You can safely run 6 - 6.5 with it but I have fast customers who only do 5 - 5.5. You will have more problems with too much pressure than too little. A well designed fuel system will go a long way in not creating problems you may attribute to the carburetor. Locating the regulator ahead of the carburetor and allowing inertia to work for you is a plus. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2024
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 590
Likes: 1,749
Liked 1,237 Times in 351 Posts
|
![]()
Update on some of the things mentioned yesterday:
-In order by cylinder #, here are the compression and leak down results from last night where compression is first and % leakage at 100 psi of pressure is second. Testing was done while the engine was warm and leak down tests were performed at TDC for each cylinder: 150/94 155/92 145/93 150/94 155/97 146/94 155/96 145/90 -I flowed the fuel line into a 1 gallon bucket and it took 37 seconds to fill it up -I took the fuel filter apart and checked it for junk. It had very little if any trash in it. It's a very high micron filter so I don't see it as a restriction, so I put it back on the car. I'm not hell bent on having it, I just like the peace of mind -the regulator is mounted on the fender well and the fuel line runs straight across the engine bay to the carburetor perpendicular to the direction of motion with a -6 line. Given the flow rate I feel comfortable I don't have a fuel delivery issue, but if you disagree please let me know. -also, I went back and slow-motion watched the in car footage from the runs and at no point during the run does the fuel pressure drop below 6 1/4 pound. This tells me that despite the Gs of acceleration, my pump keeps up/doesn't care about it. -As I stated yesterday, I've got an intake and carb coming to try, curtesy of Tim Stickles (thanks again man, you're a stud!). I'm anxious to see if/how much better it is than the one I have now. It could be all of the problem or none of it. Just don't know yet.
__________________
Dawson Pauley #2827 N/SA 1980 Malibu SW 2S 305/180 #2827 S/ST 1978 Mazda RX7 w/ 383 sbc/glide Last edited by JP1738; 02-07-2024 at 02:39 PM. Reason: Giving credit to T-Stick! |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Derby City, USA
Posts: 3,658
Likes: 1,089
Liked 8,131 Times in 1,535 Posts
|
![]()
You can take this for what it’s worth but ONE gallon in 37 seconds is not desirable. I believe you have an issue there considering you are feeding a Q jet . Also, there is a huge difference between VOLUME and PRESSURE.
|
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2024
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 590
Likes: 1,749
Liked 1,237 Times in 351 Posts
|
![]()
True but I now have answers to both questions. Pressure never dips and volume is decent. Y'all really think 2GPM isn't enough to feed a 250hp 305? I'm as green as can be when it comes to racing stock and Q-jets but I still find that hard to believe. Maybe I can back-to-back it this weekend with and without the filter and see if it makes a difference. I'll let everyone know one way or the other.
__________________
Dawson Pauley #2827 N/SA 1980 Malibu SW 2S 305/180 #2827 S/ST 1978 Mazda RX7 w/ 383 sbc/glide Last edited by JP1738; 02-07-2024 at 02:40 PM. Reason: cant type |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2020
Location: Phila, PA
Posts: 796
Likes: 0
Liked 735 Times in 386 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
ONE gallon in 37 seconds is only 1.62 GPM. While that is over 550 pounds a hour which should easily support 1000 HP. It don't always work that way. Stan |
|
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#6 | |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Belmont N.S. Canada
Posts: 473
Likes: 246
Liked 166 Times in 71 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
Also you most likely just have a whole bunch of small small issues adding up to some big losses. Only time and perseverance will fix that
__________________
Chris Chapman 1969 Chevelle NHRA F-G/SA 1090 |
|
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2024
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 590
Likes: 1,749
Liked 1,237 Times in 351 Posts
|
![]()
HOLY **** BATMAN! My heap SET SAIL this past weekend at a Darlington Dragway test session! changing nothing but timing, shift points and an intake manifold from Tim Stickles, I picked up FOUR TENTHS. Granted, it was in 1000 ft of DA and in a 15 mph tail wind, but I cracked off a mind boggling .39 under in the 1/4 mile! Wow wow wow! I'm so happy, proud, and relieved! I'll see you all in Orlando!
I tried my carb, T Stick's carb, and Chad Taylors carb, but mine ended up being the fastest. I think Chad's showed the most potential as it ran really well through the middle but suffered in the 60ft as it was set up for a 2-step but I was foot breaking. Had a little stumble in it when it left but came alive and hauled the mail out the back. Hoping to get a hold of some one this weekend who can help me go through them to see if I can optimize one for my combo! Thanks all for the advice and well wishes! We did it! We got under! Much appreciated to all!
__________________
Dawson Pauley #2827 N/SA 1980 Malibu SW 2S 305/180 #2827 S/ST 1978 Mazda RX7 w/ 383 sbc/glide Last edited by JP1738; 02-12-2024 at 10:06 AM. Reason: Wrong track |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 291
Likes: 38
Liked 359 Times in 120 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#9 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Miles From Nowhere
Posts: 7,832
Likes: 2,926
Liked 5,139 Times in 1,962 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
It sounds like you have a stock tank inside the quarter panel. In that case , you're also fighting inertia and siphon issues. Fuel cells don't cost much on Ebay. You will need to place it inside a metal box on a wagon though.
__________________
"We are lucky we don't get as much Government as we pay for." Will Rogers |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2024
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 590
Likes: 1,749
Liked 1,237 Times in 351 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
__________________
Dawson Pauley #2827 N/SA 1980 Malibu SW 2S 305/180 #2827 S/ST 1978 Mazda RX7 w/ 383 sbc/glide |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|