|
|
![]() |
#1 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: On a hilltop in Pa.
Posts: 4,479
Likes: 3,574
Liked 7,636 Times in 1,724 Posts
|
![]()
Dan, on my 307 (definitely not an LT-1!) going from the stamped rockers to roller rockers was worth absolutely nothing.
__________________
Billy Nees 1188 STK, SS I'm OK..........it's everybody else. |
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#2 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Miles From Nowhere
Posts: 7,785
Likes: 2,878
Liked 5,073 Times in 1,934 Posts
|
![]()
I have seen this right on the dyno too. Another "it depends".
__________________
"We are lucky we don't get as much Government as we pay for." Will Rogers |
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#3 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Glendale, Arizona
Posts: 3,036
Likes: 710
Liked 1,538 Times in 575 Posts
|
![]()
Mark is correct. It depends on the engine, especially on the type of engine, horsepower output and RPM. A higher horsepower/high RPM engine will benefit from aftermarket rocker arms due to reduced rocker arm deflection and stabilization of the valvetrain. Since the liberalization of camshaft specifications with more radical lobes and high pressure valve springs, a stamped rocker arm will have a very limited life.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
VIP Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: On a hilltop in Pa.
Posts: 4,479
Likes: 3,574
Liked 7,636 Times in 1,724 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
__________________
Billy Nees 1188 STK, SS I'm OK..........it's everybody else. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#5 |
VIP Member
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Shelby, NC
Posts: 1,805
Likes: 2,118
Liked 2,288 Times in 535 Posts
|
![]()
I ran treated and coated stock rockers that we machined to work with a 7/16 stud on my LT1's. I saw no performance gain going to a roller rocker. Limited travel lifters was a different story.....
|
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#6 |
Live Reporter
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Hickory, Ky
Posts: 10,612
Likes: 1,896
Liked 10,649 Times in 2,208 Posts
|
![]()
The truck engine liked the 7/16 studs they had less deflection than the 3/8.
|
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#7 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 2,127
Likes: 1,084
Liked 184 Times in 113 Posts
|
![]()
Building the Pure Stock engine replaced the 3/8 with a 7/16th stud figuring it was a good bit stronger. Cannot remember the racers name he sent me his modified LT1 SA Stock Rockers. Bought new 7/16th ball, installed them and runs smooth.
Like Billy said, he saw no gain going to Rollers. Many of our Impala Club members stayed with the Stock LT1 SA rockers installing the popular HotCam with no problems. Figuring the 3/8th Stud was not much of an issue to begin with. Wondering if someone makes a 1.5 SA Roller Tip? Use the 7/16th ball and trim the sides up to fit. Would stop all side loading on the valve and guide. I have set of original GM SA 1.6 Roller Rockers. Then again they use 3/8 stud. Saving them for a project. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|