|
|
![]() |
#1 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Northern New Jersey suburbs
Posts: 2,314
Likes: 25
Liked 544 Times in 213 Posts
|
![]()
My memory from those day of working on and looking at friends cars with a 327/300 says AFB carb.....
Made for a very cool car back then.....327/300 4 speed in a '63-'64 Impala SS...... With a decent rear gear they were pretty snappy !!! LOL
__________________
Rich Biebel S/C 1479 Stock 147R |
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 507
Likes: 8
Liked 358 Times in 83 Posts
|
![]()
I was just a kid back in '63, but I remember very vividly claims that a 327/300 (say, in a Biscayne or BelAir) would give a 409/425 all it could handle. I later owned a '63 Biscayne 327/300, 4-speed, 3.50 posi and absolutely loved the car. Everybody remember the little factory tach in the "eyebrow" housing, in the middle of the instrument panel? 327/300 and 409s only, and cooler than hell.
|
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#3 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Northern New Jersey suburbs
Posts: 2,314
Likes: 25
Liked 544 Times in 213 Posts
|
![]()
Not many 409's around back in my UTE but a good running Small Block would give the 409 all it could handle....
Only one I recall was a '64 Impala with a 409/340 or some HP rating like that, and it was not a real fast car. Good running SB Vette's were the shizzle, to me anyway....Nothing could run with one... Once Z/28's came out it was tough to top one. I graduated HS in 1965 so I was right in the thick of the Muscle Car era and it's how I got addicted to DRAG RACING.....could not resist, it was all around me !!!
__________________
Rich Biebel S/C 1479 Stock 147R Last edited by Rich Biebel; 04-21-2021 at 05:14 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: Bay City Texas
Posts: 387
Likes: 2
Liked 225 Times in 136 Posts
|
![]()
On the street the 409’s were turds as they came detuned they came with double heads gaskets to lower compression and those boat anchor pistons
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Cocoa Florida
Posts: 205
Likes: 177
Liked 72 Times in 36 Posts
|
![]()
The 62 Bubble Top was a nice looking car whether it had a 409 or a 327. i think NHRA lowered the 300 HP to now 265 hp for 1962. Cars only not the Corvette. So that might help and set the suspension up like a G-Body so it don't twist and it might work. Kenney Kelley
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Glendora,Calif.
Posts: 1,132
Likes: 172
Liked 698 Times in 216 Posts
|
![]()
Would the 327/300 have been available in the 65 Nova? That might have been a real land based missile.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Miles From Nowhere
Posts: 7,790
Likes: 2,882
Liked 5,080 Times in 1,936 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
However, @ 265 for Stock, I'd take the 4 GC version @ 241.
__________________
"We are lucky we don't get as much Government as we pay for." Will Rogers |
|
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#8 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Arkansas - In the middle of everything.
Posts: 1,999
Likes: 63
Liked 772 Times in 192 Posts
|
![]()
I have seen four in my lifetime. Two on the streets of Little Rock '65-'68, one at Lakeland in Memphis in 1971 and a match race between a 300 hp '65 Chevy II and a 271 high perf '65 Mustang at Ozark, MO in 1966. I was too young to have any detailed memories. Other than the Chevy II spanked the Mustang pretty hard. It was a dealership put on.
__________________
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 28
Likes: 10
Liked 10 Times in 5 Posts
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|